Literature DB >> 9622450

Mouse strain differences in oral operant ethanol reinforcement under continuous access conditions.

F O Risinger1, M M Brown, A M Doan, R A Oakes.   

Abstract

The present experiment examined ethanol self-administration in C57BL/6J (C57) and DBA/2J (DBA) mice using a continuous access operant procedure. Adult male C57 and DBA mice were initially trained to perform a lever press response to obtain access to 10% w/v sucrose solution. Subsequently, the mice were placed in operant chambers on a continuous (23 hr/day) basis with access to food (FR1), 10% v/v ethanol (FR4), and water from a sipper tube. C57 mice displayed greater rates of responding on the ethanol-associated lever compared with DBA mice. Responding on the food lever was the same in both strains, but DBA mice consumed greater amounts of water. C57 mice consistently displayed both prandial and nonprandial episodes (bouts) of ethanol responding. DBA mice did not respond for ethanol in bouts. Following 50 consecutive sessions, ethanol concentration was altered every 5 days. Response patterns were determined using 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30% v/v ethanol concentrations. C57 mice displayed concentration-dependent responding on the ethanol lever showing that ethanol was functioning as an effective reinforcer in this strain. In contrast, responding on the ethanol lever by DBA mice did not change as a function of ethanol concentration. Saccharin (0.2% w/v) was subsequently added to the ethanol mixture, and responding was examined at 0, 5, 10, and 20% ethanol concentrations. Overall, ethanol lever responding was increased in both strains. As before, C57 mice showed higher levels of ethanol responding, compared with DBA mice. C57 mice also showed higher responding for saccharin alone. These results are consistent with findings that suggest orally administered ethanol is a more effective reinforcer in C57 mice than in DBA mice. Furthermore, C57 mice engage in ethanol-reinforced responding over a broader range of conditions than DBA mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9622450     DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb04311.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  24 in total

1.  Dopamine dynamics associated with, and resulting from, schedule-induced alcohol self-administration: analyses in dopamine transporter knockout mice.

Authors:  Guy Mittleman; Stanford B Call; Jody L Cockroft; Dan Goldowitz; Douglas B Matthews; Charles D Blaha
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.405

2.  Motivational effects of ethanol in DARPP-32 knock-out mice.

Authors:  F O Risinger; P A Freeman; P Greengard; A A Fienberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Laurence L Miller
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  Intra-nucleus accumbens shell injections of R(+)- and S(-)-baclofen bidirectionally alter binge-like ethanol, but not saccharin, intake in C57Bl/6J mice.

Authors:  Chelsea R Kasten; Stephen L Boehm
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Impulsive choice predicts anxiety-like behavior, but not alcohol or sucrose consumption, in male Long-Evans rats.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stein; C Renee Renda; Shayne M Barker; Kennan J Liston; Timothy A Shahan; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Impact of strain and D-amphetamine on impulsivity (delay discounting) in inbred mice.

Authors:  Christa M Helms; Jamie M Reeves; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Using monosodium glutamate to initiate ethanol self-administration in inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Brian A McCool; Ann M Chappell
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 4.280

8.  Persistent enhancement of ethanol drinking following a monosodium glutamate-substitution procedure in C57BL6/J and DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  Brian A McCool; Ann M Chappell
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.405

9.  Qualitative differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice in morphine potentiation of brain stimulation reward and intravenous self-administration.

Authors:  Greg I Elmer; Jeanne O Pieper; Lindsey R Hamilton; Roy A Wise
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Influence of reinforcement schedule on ethanol consumption patterns in non-food restricted male C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Matthew M Ford; Andrea M Fretwell; Gregory P Mark; Deborah A Finn
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.