Literature DB >> 9622414

Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review.

K Coetzee1, T F Kruge, C J Lombard.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to conduct a structured review of the literature published on the use of normal sperm morphology, as an indicator of male fertility potential in the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) situation, and to establish the universal predictive value of this semen parameter. Published literature in which normal sperm morphology was used to predict fertilization and pregnancy, during the period 1978-1996, was reviewed. A total of 216 articles were identified by the sourcing methodology, but only 49 provided data that could be tabulated and analysed. Of these, only 18 provided sufficient data for statistical analysis. Fifteen studies used the strict criteria to evaluate sperm morphology, two used World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and one used both the strict criteria and the WHO guidelines. All the studies (n = 10) using the 5 and 14% normal sperm morphology thresholds (strict criteria) produced positive predictive values for IVF success. In the prediction of pregnancy, 82% (9/11) and 75% (6/8) of the studies produced positive predictive values when using the 5% and 14% thresholds respectively. Aggregating the data produced around the 5% normal sperm morphology threshold (strict criteria), the overall fertilization rates were 59.3% (1979/3337; per oocyte) for the < or = 4% group and 77.6% (10345/13327; per oocyte) for the >4% group, and the overall pregnancy rates were 15.2% (60/395; per cycle) and 26.0% (355/1368; per cycle) respectively. The no-transfer rates across the 5% threshold were 24.0% (86/359; per cycle) in the < or = 4% group compared to 7.4% (80/1088; per cycle) in the >4% group. The inclusion of an accurately evaluated normal sperm morphology count as an integral part of the standard semen analysis makes this analysis still the most cost-effective means of evaluating the male factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9622414     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/4.1.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  34 in total

1.  Acrosome index is not an absolute predictor of the outcome following conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  B Söderlund; K Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Relationship between human sperm morphology and acrosomal function.

Authors:  Roelof Menkveld; Yehia El-Garem; Wolf-Bernhard Schill; Ralf Henkel
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Semen analysis with regard to sperm number, sperm morphology and functional aspects.

Authors:  Rune Eliasson
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen.

Authors:  Roelof Menkveld
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Relation between different human sperm nuclear maturity tests and in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  M H Nasr-Esfahani; S Razavi; M Mardani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Outcome of conventional IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes in the case of isolated teratozoospermia.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Shang Wei Li; Lei Li; Zhongying Huang; Qianhong Ma; Yan Wang; Zhun Xiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  A translational medicine appraisal of specialized andrology testing in unexplained male infertility.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Rakesh K Sharma; Jaime Gosálvez; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Does omitting teratospermia as a selection criterion for ICSI change pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Bonnie Woolnough; Doron Shmorgun; Marie-Claude Leveille; Elham Sabri; Jenna Gale
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Sperm function and assisted reproduction technology.

Authors:  Ralf Henkel; Gesa MAAß; Rolf-Hasso Bödeker; Christine Scheibelhut; Thomas Stalf; Claas Mehnert; Hans-Christian Schuppe; Andreas Jung; Wolf-Bernhard Schill
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2005-03-07

Review 10.  Role of Abnormal Sperm Morphology in Predicting Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel A Shabtaie; Sabrina A Gerkowicz; Taylor P Kohn; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.