Literature DB >> 9621970

Quantifying and comparing region-of-interest activation patterns in functional brain MR imaging: methodology considerations.

R T Constable1, P Skudlarski, E Mencl, K R Pugh, R K Fulbright, C Lacadie, S E Shaywitz, B A Shaywitz.   

Abstract

The general aims of functional brain magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies are to ascertain which areas of the brain are activated during a specific task, the extent of this activation, whether different groups of subjects demonstrate different patterns of activation, and how these groups behave in different tasks. Many steps are involved in answering such questions and if each step is not carefully controlled the results may be influenced. This work has three objectives. Firstly, to present a technique for quantitatively evaluating methods used in functional imaging data analysis. While receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) analysis has been used effectively to evaluate the ability of post-processing algorithms to detect true activations while rejecting false activations, it is difficult to adapt such a technique for comparisons of methods for quantitating activations. We present a technique based on the ANOVA, between two or more regions of interest (ROIs), subject groups, or activation tasks, over a range of statistical thresholds, which reveals the sensitivity of different activation quantification metrics to noise and other variables. Secondly, we use this technique to compare two methods of quantifying localized brain activation. There are numerous ways of quantifying the amount of activation present in a specific region of the brain in an individual subject. We compare the pixel count approach, which simply counts the number of pixels above an arbitrary statistical threshold, with an approach based on the sum of t-values above the same arbitrary t-value threshold. Finally, we examine the sensitivity of the results from an analysis of variance, to user defined parameters such as threshold and region of interest size. Both simulated and real functional magnetic resonance data are used to demonstrate these techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9621970     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(97)00278-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  6 in total

1.  SmartPhantom--an fMRI simulator.

Authors:  Hu Cheng; Qun Zhao; George R Duensing; Williams A Edelstein; Diana Spencer; Nick Browne; Charles Saylor; Mark Limkeman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Motor and premotor cortices in subcortical stroke: proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy measures and arm motor impairment.

Authors:  Sorin C Craciunas; William M Brooks; Randolph J Nudo; Elena A Popescu; In-Young Choi; Phil Lee; Hung-Wen Yeh; Cary R Savage; Carmen M Cirstea
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Neuronal-glial alterations in non-primary motor areas in chronic subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Carmen M Cirstea; Randolph J Nudo; Sorin C Craciunas; Elena A Popescu; In-Young Choi; Phil Lee; Hung-Wen Yeh; Cary R Savage; William M Brooks
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Primary somatosensory cortex in chronic low back pain - a H-MRS study.

Authors:  Neena K Sharma; Kenneth McCarson; Linda Van Dillen; Angela Lentz; Talal Khan; Carmen M Cirstea
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Functional neuronal network activity differs with cognitive dysfunction in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Mark W DiFrancesco; Darren R Gitelman; Marisa S Klein-Gitelman; Anna Carmela P Sagcal-Gironella; Frank Zelko; Dean Beebe; Todd Parrish; Jessica Hummel; Jun Ying; Hermine I Brunner
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  Seeking Optimal Region-Of-Interest (ROI) Single-Value Summary Measures for fMRI Studies in Imaging Genetics.

Authors:  Yunxia Tong; Qiang Chen; Thomas E Nichols; Roberta Rasetti; Joseph H Callicott; Karen F Berman; Daniel R Weinberger; Venkata S Mattay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.