Literature DB >> 9621841

Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders.

R De Beni1, P Palladino, F Pazzaglia, C Cornoldi.   

Abstract

This study tests the hypothesis that the ability to inhibit already processed and actually irrelevant information could influence performance in the listening span test (Daneman & Carpenter, 1980) and have a crucial role in reading comprehension. In two experiments, the listening span test and a new working memory test were given to two groups of young adults, poor and good comprehenders, matched for logical reasoning ability. In Experiment 1, the poor comprehenders had a significantly lower performance in the listening span test associated to a higher number of intrusions--that is, recalled words that, in spite of being in sentence form, were not placed in the last position. In Experiment 2, a new working memory test was devised in order to analyse more effectively the occurrence of intrusions. Subjects were required to listen to a growing series of strings of animal and non-animal words. While listening, they had to detect when an animal word occurred, and at the end of each series they had to recall the last word of each string. The poor comprehenders obtained a significantly lower performance in the memory task and made a higher number of intrusions, particularly of animal words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9621841     DOI: 10.1080/713755761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  34 in total

1.  Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability.

Authors:  P Chiappe; L Hasher; L S Siegel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

2.  Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers.

Authors:  M C Passolunghi; C Cornoldi; S De Liberto
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

3.  Cognitive inhibition in selection and sequential retrieval.

Authors:  K Arbuthnott; J I Campbell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

4.  Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension.

Authors:  P Palladino; C Cornoldi; R De Beni; F Pazzaglia
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

5.  Effect of focus on verbal working memory: critical role of the focus word in reading.

Authors:  Mariko Osak; Yukiko Nishizaki; Mie Komori; Naoyuki Osaka
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

Review 6.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

7.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2012-03-12

8.  Working memory components and imagery instructions in the elaboration of a spatial mental model.

Authors:  Valérie Gyselinck; Rossana De Beni; Francesca Pazzaglia; Chiara Meneghetti; Amandine Mondoloni
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-16

9.  The effects of pediatric traumatic brain injury on verbal and visual-spatial working memory.

Authors:  Stephanie Gorman; Marcia A Barnes; Paul R Swank; Mary Prasad; Linda Ewing-Cobbs
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Effect of preschool working memory, language, and narrative abilities on inferential comprehension at school-age in children with spina bifida myelomeningocele and typically developing children.

Authors:  Meredith Pike; Paul Swank; Heather Taylor; Susan Landry; Marcia A Barnes
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.