Literature DB >> 9621526

Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing Lichtenstein with modified Bassini repair of inguinal hernia.

M J Prior1, E V Williams, H S Shukla, S Phillips, S Vig, M Lewis.   

Abstract

We present a prospective randomized study of 80 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent either a modified Bassini repair (n = 38) or a Lichtenstein mesh repair (n = 42). Treatment groups were matched for age, side of hernia, type of hernia and ASA grade. There was no difference in the time taken to perform the two operations: the mean time taken to perform Lichtenstein repair was 26.8 min (range 12 to 49), Bassini repair taking a mean of 27.5 min (range 9 to 51), P = 0.76. There was, however, a difference between the operating times with respect to the type of hernia present, direct hernias being the fastest to repair. Pain scores were assessed by a visual analogue scale, and there was significantly less pain in the Lichtenstein group, P = 0.028. Despite this, there was no difference between the analgesic requirements of the two groups, P = 0.073. In order to assess rehabilitation, lengths of time not working and not driving were assessed. There was no difference in either measurement, P = 0.335 and 0.467 respectively. Patients were followed up a mean of 7 weeks post-operatively (range 1 to 13 weeks). There was no significant difference between the two procedures with regard to post-operative urinary complications, wound infection or other complications. All measurements except the time taken to perform the operation were independent of the surgeon involved. The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis was also assessed, and found to be moderate, with 63% of diagnoses being correct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9621526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb        ISSN: 0035-8835


  8 in total

1.  Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Evolution of an inguinal hernia surgery practice.

Authors:  M Mokete; J J Earnshaw
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Determinant factors of pain after ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy: a multi-variate analysis.

Authors:  H Lau; F Lee
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  A physiologically relevant atherogenic diet causes severe endothelial dysfunction within 4 weeks in rabbit.

Authors:  Sudarshan Rai; David L Hare; Anthony Zulli
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Prosthetic repair of incarcerated inguinal hernias: is it a reliable method?

Authors:  Hayrullah Derici; Haluk R Unalp; Okay Nazli; Erdinc Kamer; Murat Coskun; Tugrul Tansug; Ali D Bozdag
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Hernia repair with porcine small-intestinal submucosa.

Authors:  L Ansaloni; F Catena; S Gagliardi; F Gazzotti; L D'Alessandro; A D Pinna
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 7.  Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.

Authors:  Kathleen Lockhart; Douglas Dunn; Shawn Teo; Jessica Y Ng; Manvinder Dhillon; Edward Teo; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-13

8.  Hernioplasty with and without mesh: analysis of the immediate complications in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Mariano Palermo; Pablo A Acquafresca; Miguel Bruno; Francisco Tarsitano
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.