Literature DB >> 9621380

Amniocentesis before 14 completed weeks as an alternative to transabdominal chorionic villus sampling: a controlled trial with infant follow-up.

H T Nagel1, F P Vandenbussche, M J Keirse, D Oepkes, J C Oosterwijk, G Beverstock, H H Kanhai.   

Abstract

A (semi-) randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up was conducted to compare the effects of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling and early amniocentesis on fetal mortality and child morbidity. Women requesting early prenatal diagnosis for advanced maternal age were allocated to early amniocentesis or transabdominal chorionic villus sampling either by randomization or, if they declined randomization, by their own choice. Of the 212 women who entered the study, 117 were randomized, 70 chose early amniocentesis and 25 chose transabdominal chorionic villus sampling. Overall, 130 women underwent early amniocentesis and 74 underwent transabdominal chorionic villus sampling at a median gestation of 12 weeks. Two women were excluded because of fetal death before the procedure. Mosaic karyotypes were found in 5.4 per cent of the early amniocenteses and in none of the chorionic villus samples. All unintended fetal losses occurred after early amniocentesis with a frequency of 6.2 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval: 2.7 per cent to 11.8 per cent). Talipes equinovarus was only observed after early amniocentesis with a frequency of 3.1 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval: 0.8 per cent to 7.7 per cent). We conclude that chorionic villus sampling remains the method of choice if prenatal diagnosis is needed in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9621380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Fernandes; Dianne Bryant; Lauren Griffith; Mohamed El-Rabbany; Nisha M Fernandes; Crystal Kean; Jacquelyn Marsh; Siddhi Mathur; Rebecca Moyer; Clare J Reade; John J Riva; Lyndsay Somerville; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Club foot, an adverse outcome of early amniocentesis: disruption or deformation? CEMAT. Canadian Early and Mid-Trimester Amniocentesis Trial.

Authors:  S A Farrell; A M Summers; L Dallaire; J Singer; J A Johnson; R D Wilson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Kåre Birger Hagen; P J Devereaux; Dianne Bryant; Doris Tove Kristoffersen; Andrew David Oxman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-21

Review 4.  Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Kate Navaratnam; Faris Mujezinovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-04

Review 5.  Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; K Sundberg; S Brigham
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

6.  Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Hüseyin Çağlayan Özcan; Mete Gürol Uğur; Seyhun Sucu; Aynur Mustafa; Neslihan Bayramoğlu Tepe; Özcan Balat
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06-15

Review 7.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.