Literature DB >> 9619942

Reamed versus unreamed femoral nails. A randomised, prospective trial.

M G Clatworthy1, D I Clark, D H Gray, A E Hardy.   

Abstract

We performed a randomised, prospective trial to evaluate the use of unreamed titanium nails for femoral fractures. Of 48 patients with 50 femoral fractures 45 were followed to union; 23 with an unreamed and 22 with a reamed nail. The study was stopped early because of a high rate of implant failure. The fractures in the unreamed group were slower to unite (39.4 weeks) than those in the reamed group (28.5 weeks; p = 0.007). The time to union was over nine months in 57% of the unreamed group and in 18% of the reamed group. In the unreamed group 14 secondary procedures were required in ten patients to enhance healing compared with three in three patients in the reamed group. Six implants (13%) failed, three in each group. Four of these six fractures showed evidence of delayed union. To achieve quicker union and fewer implant failures we recommend the use of reamed nails of at least 12 mm in diameter for female patients and 13 mm in males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9619942     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b3.7493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  9 in total

1.  [Reaming debris: a source of vital cells! First results of human specimens].

Authors:  K Trinkaus; S Wenisch; C Siemers; D Hose; R Schnettler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures. Evaluation of a group of 101 cases.

Authors:  Claudio Iacobellis; Leonardo Strukul
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-03-01

3.  [Why do osteosyntheses fail? The problem with biomechanics and biology].

Authors:  F Kutscha-Lissberg; K F Hopf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  [Unreamed intramedullary nailing].

Authors:  R Attal; M Blauth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Weight-bearing status may influence rates of radiographic healing following reamed, intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal femur fractures.

Authors:  Christopher D Flanagan; Noah M Joseph; Jonathan Copp; Nicholas Romeo; Nicholas Alfonso; Adam Hirschfeld
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2021-10-01

6.  Does nail size or difference between canal and nail diameter influence likelihood of union or time to union of femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing? A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chiu-Yu Shih; Chew-Teng Kor; Cheng-Pu Hsieh; Chiu-Liang Chen; Yu-Cheng Lo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Expandable intramedullary nails in lower limb trauma: a systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  David M Rose; Toby O Smith; Dominic Nielsen; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2013-03-10

8.  Clinical outcome of ream versus unream intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Farshid Bagheri; Seyed Reza Sharifi; Navid Reza Mirzadeh; Alireza Hootkani; Mohamad Hosein Ebrahimzadeh; Hami Ashraf
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 0.611

9.  Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral fractures: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A-Bing Li; Wei-Jiang Zhang; Wei-Jun Guo; Xin-Hua Wang; Hai-Ming Jin; You-Ming Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.