Literature DB >> 9619617

Short deceleration time of mitral inflow E velocity: prognostic implication with atrial fibrillation versus sinus rhythm.

D G Hurrell1, J K Oh, D W Mahoney, F A Miller, J B Seward.   

Abstract

The present study retrospectively identified 367 patients who had restrictive physiology as defined by deceleration time < or = 130 msec; 293 were in sinus rhythm (SR) (194 men and 99 women; mean age 64 +/- 14 years) and 74 were in atrial fibrillation (AF) (51 men and 23 women; mean age 72 +/- 11 years; p < 0.001). Both groups had similar underlying diagnoses and no significant difference in Doppler indices (E wave, 96 +/- 23 vs 99 +/- 22 cm/sec in SR and AF, respectively; deceleration time, 116 +/- 12 vs 116 +/- 13 msec; and left ventricular outflow tract time velocity integral, 14.8 +/- 4.8 vs 14.5 +/- 4.4 cm). Left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in SR patients (29% +/- 16% vs 39% +/- 20%; p = 0.0003). There were 120 deaths (41%) in the SR group and 35 (47%) in the AF group (median follow-up for both groups, 2.2 years). Restrictive physiology as defined by Doppler echocardiography (deceleration time < or = 130 msec) appears to predict a similar poor prognosis with AF as with SR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9619617     DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(98)70025-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  7 in total

1.  Changes in the Doppler myocardial performance index during dobutamine echocardiography: association with neurohormonal activation and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B Nørager; M Husic; J E Møller; A Bo Hansen; P A Pellikka; K Egstrup
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Tissue Doppler-derived index of left ventricular filling pressure, E/E', predicts survival of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  H Okura; Y Takada; T Kubo; K Iwata; S Mizoguchi; H Taguchi; I Toda; J Yoshikawa; K Yoshida
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Left ventricular diastolic function and long-term outcomes in patients with normal exercise echocardiographic findings.

Authors:  S Michael Gharacholou; Christopher G Scott; Paul Y Takahashi; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Robert B McCully; Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The prognostic importance of a history of hypertension in patients with symptomatic heart failure is substantially worsened by a short mitral inflow deceleration time.

Authors:  Charlotte Andersson; Gunnar H Gislason; Peter Weeke; Jesper Kjaergaard; Christian Hassager; Dilek Akkan; Jacob E Møller; Lars Køber; Christian Torp-Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Left ventricular diastolic function in hypertension: methodological considerations and clinical implications.

Authors:  Pasquale Palmiero; Annapaola Zito; Maria Maiello; Matteo Cameli; Pietro Amedeo Modesti; Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Salvatore Novo; Pier Sergio Saba; Pietro Scicchitano; Roberto Pedrinelli; Marco Matteo Ciccone
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-12-29

6.  Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in thalassemia major patients with normal left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  Benjaporn Chinprateep; Nithima Ratanasit; Yodying Kaolawanich; Khemajira Karaketklang; Pairash Saiviroonporn; Vip Viprakasit; Rungroj Krittayaphong
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Impact of body mass index on diastolic function in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  W Aljaroudi; C Halley; P Houghtaling; S Agarwal; V Menon; L Rodriguez; R A Grimm; J D Thomas; W A Jaber
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 5.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.