Literature DB >> 961954

Estimates of motor vehicle seat belt effectiveness and use: implications for occupant crash protection.

L S Robertson.   

Abstract

Estimates of the effectiveness of seat belts, when used, in reducing motor vehicle occupant deaths vary widely. A recently publicized claim by one analyst that seat belts reduce vehicle occupant deaths 70-80 per cent is based on studies found to contain fundamental systematic error. Deaths occur only 50 per cent less often to belted compared to nonbelted vehicle occupants in crashes, according to previously unanalyzed data from three U.S. states during recent years. New belt systems would be about 60 per cent effective with 100 per cent use. But surveys of observed belt use in 1975 U.S. cars indicate that two-thirds of drivers were not using belts. Prospects for widespread adoption and enforcement of belt use laws in the U.S. are not encouraging. Substantial reductions in fatal and other injuries would result from the adoption of requirements mandating automatic (passive) protection for front seat occupants in crashes with forward decelerations.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 961954      PMCID: PMC1653464          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.66.9.859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  5 in total

1.  Safety belt use in automobiles with starter-interlock and buzzer-light reminder systems.

Authors:  L S Robertson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Editorial: Perspective on a current public health controversy.

Authors:  W Haddon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A controlled study of the effect of television messages on safety belt use.

Authors:  L S Robertson; A B Kelley; B O'Neill; C W Wixom; R S Eiswirth; W Haddon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The buzzer-light reminder system and safety belt use.

Authors:  L S Robertson; W Haddon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Editorial: Compulsory wearing of seat belts in New South Wales, Australia. An evaluation of its effect on vehicle occupant deaths in the first year.

Authors:  M Henderson; R Wood
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1973-10-27       Impact factor: 7.738

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Association of seat belt use with death: a comparison of estimates based on data from police and estimates based on data from trained crash investigators.

Authors:  P Cummings
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Seat belt use during pregnancy.

Authors:  M Schiff; T Kasnic; K Reiff; D Pathak
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-06

3.  The phantom taxi seat belt.

Authors:  C Welkon; K S Reisinger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Targeting progress in health.

Authors:  J M McGinnis
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Relative mortality of unbelted infant passengers and belted non-infant passengers in air accidents with survivors.

Authors:  D Fife; B Rosner; W McKibben
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  What kinds of people do not use seat belts?

Authors:  K J Helsing; G W Comstock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Association Between Emergency Medical Service Response Time and Motor Vehicle Crash Mortality in the United States.

Authors:  James P Byrne; N Clay Mann; Mengtao Dai; Stephanie A Mason; Paul Karanicolas; Sandro Rizoli; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Cost-benefit analysis of safety belts in Texas school buses.

Authors:  C E Begley; A K Biddle
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.