Literature DB >> 9618421

Delta opioid receptor enhancement of mu opioid receptor-induced antinociception in spinal cord.

L He1, N M Lee.   

Abstract

Although the mu selective agonist [D-Ala2-MePhe4-Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO) and the delta selective agonist [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE) are both antinociceptive when administered directly into the spinal cord of mice, 50% of antinociceptive dose (AD50) of DAMGO is about 2 orders of magnitude lower than the AD50 of DPDPE. In contrast, the two ligands show similar affinities for their respective receptors in in vitro binding assays. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that DPDPE antinociception in the spinal cord is mediated through not delta but mu receptors, for which it has an several hundred-fold lower affinity than DAMGO. In support of this, we found that DPDPE-mediated antinociception was blocked by the mu selective antagonist D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTAP). The pA2 value of CTAP for DPDPE was virtually identical with that for DAMGO. However, because its action also was blocked by naltrindole, an antagonist selective for delta receptors, the latter must also play a role in antinociception. When DAMGO and DPDPE were administered i.t. together at ratios ranging from 1:200 to 1:500, the AD50 of DAMGO was lowered as much as 10-fold relative to its AD50 when given alone. Thus DPDPE had a potentiating effect on DAMGO, although the reverse was not observed. This potentiation was lost in animals made tolerant to systemic morphine. The loss of potentiation seemed to be caused by changes in the delta receptors, because a) the AD50 of DAMGO (i.t.) given alone to tolerant animals was virtually the same as for naive animals, whereas the AD50 of DPDPE given alone increased by 4-fold; and b) the AD50 of DPDPE given alone in the tolerant animal was increased only slightly by naltrindole, whereas CTAP was still a very potent antagonist. We conclude that DPDPE, a selective delta agonist, mediates antinociception in the spinal cord through mu receptors, consistent with results of recent studies of "knock-out" mice lacking mu receptors. At the same time, however, the delta agonist acting through delta receptors can potentiate the mu receptor-mediated antinociceptive action of either mu or delta agonists. This potentiating effect, like the synergistic effect observed between mu receptors at spinal and supraspinal sites, is lost during tolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9618421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  20 in total

1.  A role for heterodimerization of mu and delta opiate receptors in enhancing morphine analgesia.

Authors:  Ivone Gomes; Achla Gupta; Julija Filipovska; Hazel H Szeto; John E Pintar; Lakshmi A Devi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Opioid ligands with mixed mu/delta opioid receptor interactions: an emerging approach to novel analgesics.

Authors:  Subramaniam Ananthan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  In vivo pharmacological resultant analysis reveals noncompetitive interactions between opioid antagonists in the rat tail-withdrawal assay.

Authors:  E A Walker
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Co-administration of δ- and μ-opioid receptor agonists promotes peripheral opioid receptor function.

Authors:  Cicely L Schramm; Christopher N Honda
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 5.  Mu opioids and their receptors: evolution of a concept.

Authors:  Gavril W Pasternak; Ying-Xian Pan
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Emergence of functional spinal delta opioid receptors after chronic ethanol exposure.

Authors:  Richard M van Rijn; Daniela I Brissett; Jennifer L Whistler
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 7.  Recent advances on the δ opioid receptor: from trafficking to function.

Authors:  Louis Gendron; Nitish Mittal; Hélène Beaudry; Wendy Walwyn
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Essential role of mu opioid receptor in the regulation of delta opioid receptor-mediated antihyperalgesia.

Authors:  L Gendron; J E Pintar; C Chavkin
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Modulation of opiate-related signaling molecules in morphine-dependent conditioned behavior: conditioned place preference to morphine induces CREB phosphorylation.

Authors:  José A Morón; Srinivas Gullapalli; Chirisse Taylor; Achla Gupta; Ivone Gomes; Lakshmi A Devi
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Design and synthesis of novel bivalent ligands (MOR and DOR) by conjugation of enkephalin analogues with 4-anilidopiperidine derivatives.

Authors:  Srinivas Deekonda; Lauren Wugalter; David Rankin; Tally M Largent-Milnes; Peg Davis; Yue Wang; Neemah M Bassirirad; Josephine Lai; Vinod Kulkarni; Todd W Vanderah; Frank Porreca; Victor J Hruby
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.