Literature DB >> 9618321

Validating new toxicology tests for regulatory acceptance

.   

Abstract

Before a new or revised toxicology test is considered acceptable for safety evaluation of new substances, the test users and the industrial and regulatory decision makers must feel comfortable with it, and the decisions it supports. Comfort with, and the acceptance of, a new test comes after knowing that it has been validated for its proposed use. The validation process is designed to determine the operational characteristics of a test, that is, its reliability and relevance, in addition to its strengths and limitations. The reliability of a test is measured by its reproducibility. Its relevance is judged by its mechanistic relationship to the health effects of concern, and its ability to predict or identify those effects. The U.S. government has recently formed the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) to work with federal agencies and test developers to coordinate the evaluation and adoption of new test methods. The ICCVAM will provide guidance to agencies and other stakeholders on criteria and processes for development, validation, and acceptance of tests; coordinate technical reviews of proposed new tests of interagency interest; facilitate information sharing among agencies; and serve as an interagency resource and communications link with parties outside of the federal government on matters of test method validation. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Year:  1998        PMID: 9618321     DOI: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  2 in total

1.  Meeting report: alternatives for developmental neurotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Pamela Lein; Paul Locke; Alan Goldberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.

Authors:  Masamitsu Honma; Airi Kitazawa; Alex Cayley; Richard V Williams; Chris Barber; Thierry Hanser; Roustem Saiakhov; Suman Chakravarti; Glenn J Myatt; Kevin P Cross; Emilio Benfenati; Giuseppa Raitano; Ovanes Mekenyan; Petko Petkov; Cecilia Bossa; Romualdo Benigni; Chiara Laura Battistelli; Alessandro Giuliani; Olga Tcheremenskaia; Christine DeMeo; Ulf Norinder; Hiromi Koga; Ciloy Jose; Nina Jeliazkova; Nikolay Kochev; Vesselina Paskaleva; Chihae Yang; Pankaj R Daga; Robert D Clark; James Rathman
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.