Literature DB >> 9617909

Partial-volume Bayesian classification of material mixtures in MR volume data using voxel histograms.

D H Laidlaw1, K W Fleischer, A H Barr.   

Abstract

We present a new algorithm for identifying the distribution of different material types in volumetric datasets such as those produced with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Because we allow for mixtures of materials and treat voxels as regions, our technique reduces errors that other classification techniques can create along boundaries between materials and is particularly useful for creating accurate geometric models and renderings from volume data. It also has the potential to make volume measurements more accurately and classifies noisy, low-resolution data well. There are two unusual aspects to our approach. First, we assume that, due to partial-volume effects, or blurring, voxels can contain more than one material, e.g., both muscle and fat; we compute the relative proportion of each material in the voxels. Second, we incorporate information from neighboring voxels into the classification process by reconstructing a continuous function, rho(x), from the samples and then looking at the distribution of values that rho(x) takes on within the region of a voxel. This distribution of values is represented by a histogram taken over the region of the voxel; the mixture of materials that those values measure is identified within the voxel using a probabilistic Bayesian approach that matches the histogram by finding the mixture of materials within each voxel most likely to have created the histogram. The size of regions that we classify is chosen to match the spacing of the samples because the spacing is intrinsically related to the minimum feature size that the reconstructed continuous function can represent.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9617909     DOI: 10.1109/42.668696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  17 in total

1.  Automated brain tissue segmentation based on fractional signal mapping from inversion recovery Look-Locker acquisition.

Authors:  Wanyong Shin; Xiujuan Geng; Hong Gu; Wang Zhan; Qihong Zou; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Volume visualization: a technical overview with a focus on medical applications.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Roy Eagleson; Terry M Peters
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Part 1. Automated change detection and characterization in serial MR studies of brain-tumor patients.

Authors:  Julia Willamena Patriarche; Bradley James Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Measurement of cortical thickness from MRI by minimum line integrals on soft-classified tissue.

Authors:  Iman Aganj; Guillermo Sapiro; Neelroop Parikshak; Sarah K Madsen; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  SEGMENTATION-FREE MEASURING OF CORTICAL THICKNESS FROM MRI.

Authors:  Iman Aganj; Guillermo Sapiro; Neelroop Parikshak; Sarah K Madsen; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2008-05

6.  Using Bayesian tissue classification to improve the accuracy of vestibular schwannoma volume and growth measurement.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Vokurka; Amit Herwadkar; Neil A Thacker; Richard T Ramsden; Alan Jackson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Comparison of T1-weighted 2D TSE, 3D SPGR, and two-point 3D Dixon MRI for automated segmentation of visceral adipose tissue at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Faezeh Fallah; Jürgen Machann; Petros Martirosian; Fabian Bamberg; Fritz Schick; Bin Yang
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  CT volumetry of intravertebral cement after kyphoplasty. Comparison of polymethylmethacrylate and calcium phosphate in a 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  M Libicher; M Vetter; I Wolf; G Noeldge; C Kasperk; I Grafe; K Da Fonseca; J Hillmeier; P J Meeder; H P Meinzer; G W Kauffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  An EM approach to MAP solution of segmenting tissue mixtures: a numerical analysis.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Su Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Comparison of breast tissue measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, digital mammography and a mathematical algorithm.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Raleigh F Johnson; Fatima Nayeem; Donald G Brunder; Hyunsu Ju; Morton H Leonard; James J Grady; Tuenchit Khamapirad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.