Literature DB >> 9617829

Optimisation of a heterogeneous non-competitive flow immunoassay comparing fluorescein, peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase as labels.

A Lindgren1, J Emnéus, G Marko-Varga, H Irth, A Oosterkamp, S Eremin.   

Abstract

Off- and on-line strategies for a non-competitive heterogeneous flow immunoassay were developed comparing three different labels. The samples, containing the model compounds digoxin or digoxigenin, were either pre-incubated off-line or on-line in a mixing coil with excess of labelled anti-digoxigenin Fab-fragments. The excess of Fab-fragments was then separated from the digoxin bound Fab-fragments by passing the sample through a column with immobilised digoxin. The off-line immunochemical detection system is suitable for sensitive high through-put screening of the analytes, whereas the on-line system is more suitable for coupling as a post-column detection unit to liquid chromatography. The digoxin and digoxigenin content in the sample were quantified using fluorescein (F) and enzyme (peroxidase (POD), alkaline phosphatase (AP)) labelled Fab-fragments. The fluorescein label was directly measured with the fluorescence detector, whereas a fluorescent enzyme product was measured in the two enzyme based systems, using 3-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-propionic acid (HPPA) and hydrogen peroxide for POD and, and 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (4-MUP) for AP. The highest sensitivity and lowest limit of detection (LOD) was obtained with the Fab-POD system with LODs for digoxin and digoxigenin in the off- and on-line configurations of 0.025 and 0.01 nM, respectively. The sample through-put for the off- and on-line systems were 43 and 32 samples per hour, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9617829     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(97)00169-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  4 in total

Review 1.  Immunoaffinity chromatography: an introduction to applications and recent developments.

Authors:  Annette C Moser; David S Hage
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Chromatographic immunoassays: strategies and recent developments in the analysis of drugs and biological agents.

Authors:  Ryan Matsuda; Elliott Rodriguez; Doddavenkatanna Suresh; David S Hage
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Development of microcolumn-based one-site immunometric assays for protein biomarkers.

Authors:  Erika L Pfaunmiller; Jeanethe A Anguizola; Mitchell L Milanuk; Efthimia Papastavros; NaTasha Carter; Ryan Matsuda; Xiwei Zheng; David S Hage
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 4.  Affinity monolith chromatography: A review of general principles and recent developments.

Authors:  Saumen Poddar; Sadia Sharmeen; David S Hage
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.595

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.