Literature DB >> 9617533

Newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism.

A M Walker1.   

Abstract

Research on the relationship between venous thromboembolism and the progestagen content of combined oral contraceptives has pointed to an increase in risk associated with products containing desogestrel and gestodene. Although many biases must have been at play in these nonexperimental studies, the errors that have been suggested and examined are not of a sufficient magnitude to account for the observed results. The most plausible explanation of the available data is that combined oral contraceptives containing desogestrel and gestodene carry a very small risk of venous thromboembolism, which exceeds the even smaller risk carried by products containing levonorgestrel. The position of norgestimate is uncertain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents, Female--pharmacodynamics; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin--pharmacodynamics; Contraceptive Agents--pharmacodynamics; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Desogestrel--pharmacodynamics; Diseases; Embolism; Error Sources; Family Planning; Gestodene--pharmacodynamics; Literature Review; Measurement; Oral Contraceptives, Combined--side effects; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Thromboembolism; Vascular Diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9617533     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00014-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  The third generation oral contraceptive controversy. The evidence shows they are less safe than second generation pills.

Authors:  P A O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

2.  Case reports in an evidence-based world.

Authors:  J P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Competing interests and controversy about third generation oral contraceptives. BMJ readers should know whose words they read.

Authors:  J P Vandenbroucke; F M Helmerhorst; F R Rosendaal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-05

4.  Third generation oral contraceptives.

Authors:  D C Skegg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-22

5.  Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Kemmeren; A Algra; D E Grobbee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

Review 6.  Cardiovascular events associated with different combined oral contraceptives: a review of current data.

Authors:  P Hannaford
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Developments in post-marketing comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  S Schneeweiss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  Is the large simple trial design used for comparative, post-approval safety research? A review of a clinical trials registry and the published literature.

Authors:  Robert F Reynolds; Joanna A Lem; Nicolle M Gatto; Sybil M Eng
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  A pathway to improved prospective observational post-authorization safety studies.

Authors:  Victor A Kiri
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study.

Authors:  A van Hylckama Vlieg; F M Helmerhorst; J P Vandenbroucke; C J M Doggen; F R Rosendaal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.