Literature DB >> 9617346

Heterogeneity of p53 mutational status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

S Kuwabara1, Y Ajioka, H Watanabe, J Hitomi, K Nishikura, K Hatakeyama.   

Abstract

In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, p53 gene mutations have been analyzed for inter- or intra-patient heterogeneity but only a few studies have investigated intratumoral heterogeneity. We investigated this question within individual esophageal cancers, and also in their lymph-node metastases in 8 cases. Analyzing the p53 gene sequence by direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products, we found heterogeneity for p53 mutations in the pre-invasive area in 3 esophageal cancers. In all areas sampled in the invasive portion of each cancer, the p53 mutational status was identical in a given tumor. In heterogeneous tumors, the invasive area showed one of the p53 mutations found in the pre-invasive area. In nodal metastases, the p53 mutation was identical to that in the invasive area of each primary tumor. These data suggest that the timing of p53 alteration is not as early as might have been expected, indicating that, in regard to p53 gene alteration, some esophageal cancers are composed of various subclones in the pre-invasive stage with invasiveness developing in one of them, which becomes predominant through clonal selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9617346      PMCID: PMC5921814          DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1998.tb00578.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res        ISSN: 0910-5050


  36 in total

1.  Analysis of the p53 gene mutations in patients with multiple primary cancers of the oesophagus.

Authors:  T Mayama; T Mori; K Abe; H Sasano; T Nishihira; S Satomi; A Horii
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Clinical implications of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene.

Authors:  C C Harris; M Hollstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  p53 immunostaining distinguishes malignant from benign lesions of the gall-bladder.

Authors:  Y Oohashi; H Watanabe; Y Ajioka; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.534

4.  p53 mutations in ovarian cancer: a late event?

Authors:  R Mazars; P Pujol; T Maudelonde; P Jeanteur; C Theillet
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Expression of mutated p53 occurs in tumor-distant epithelia of head and neck cancer patients: a possible molecular basis for the development of multiple tumors.

Authors:  M Nees; N Homann; H Discher; T Andl; C Enders; C Herold-Mende; A Schuhmann; F X Bosch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  p53 tumor suppressor gene mutation in early esophageal precancerous lesions and carcinoma among high-risk populations in Henan, China.

Authors:  H Gao; L D Wang; Q Zhou; J Y Hong; T Y Huang; C S Yang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Maintenance of p53 alterations throughout breast cancer progression.

Authors:  A M Davidoff; B J Kerns; J D Iglehart; J R Marks
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  p53 protein accumulation and gene mutations in multifocal esophageal precancerous lesions from symptom free subjects in a high incidence area for esophageal carcinoma in Henan, China.

Authors:  L D Wang; Q Zhou; J Y Hong; S L Qiu; C S Yang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Somatic mutations detected by mini- and microsatellite DNA markers reveal clonal intratumor heterogeneity in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  S Nagel; B Borisch; S L Thein; M Oestreicher; F Nöthiger; S Birrer; A Tobler; M F Fey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  p53 mutations in sporadic adrenocortical tumors.

Authors:  H Ohgaki; P Kleihues; P U Heitz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1993-05-28       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  4 in total

1.  Limitations of tissue microarrays compared with whole tissue sections in survival analysis.

Authors:  M Haysam Khouja; Mark Baekelandt; Agkha Sarab; Jahn M Nesland; Ruth Holm
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Aneuploidy vs. gene mutation hypothesis of cancer: recent study claims mutation but is found to support aneuploidy.

Authors:  R Li; A Sonik; R Stindl; D Rasnick; P Duesberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  p53 expression in squamous dysplasia associated with carcinoma of the oesophagus: evidence for field carcinogenesis.

Authors:  M Yasuda; H Kuwano; M Watanabe; Y Toh; S Ohno; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Expression of PAX2 and PAX8 in Wilms Tumor: A Tissue Microarray-based Immunohistochemical Study.

Authors:  Salma Sefidbakht; Atieh Khorsand; Sahar Omidi; Sedigheh Mohsenpourian; Elham Mirzaian
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2021-05-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.