Literature DB >> 9615512

The meaning of DNR status: oncology nurses' experiences with patients and families.

M A Jezewski1, D S Finnell.   

Abstract

Patients, providers, and families are increasingly involved in end-of-life decisions (advance directives, health care proxy, do-not-resuscitate [DNR] status consents). These decisions can be complex processes whereby the participants in the process must come to terms with often painful and difficult decisions. The role perception of the nurse in end-of-life decision making is not well delineated. This chapter explores the results of a study that addresses the question, "What are the experiences of oncology nurses as they interact with patients and/or family members during the process of patients/families signing DNR consents. The grounded theory method of data collection and analysis was used to explore this question. The results of the study indicate that central to the process of consenting to DNR status is the degree of shared understanding about the meaning of DNR status among participants and the conflict that can occur when meanings are not shared. A model is presented that illustrates the connections between the meanings of DNR (patient, family, and provider) and congruence and conflict in the DNR consent process. Strategies are discussed that facilitate prevention or resolution of conflict in the DNR status decision-making process. Strategies used by the nurse to facilitate decision making by patient and families include communicating with, caring for, educating, advocating for, and collaborating with patients, families, and other providers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9615512     DOI: 10.1097/00002820-199806000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  7 in total

1.  Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units.

Authors:  C M Breen; A P Abernethy; K H Abbott; J A Tulsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A prospective trial of a new policy eliminating signed consent for do not resuscitate orders.

Authors:  Daniel P Sulmasy; Johanna R Sood; Kenneth Texiera; Ruth L McAuley; Jennifer McGugins; Wayne A Ury
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Practical effects of educating nurses on the Natural Death Act.

Authors:  Li-Yun Tsai; Mei-Yu Lee; Yuen-Liang Lai; In-Fun Li; Ching-Ping Liu; Tse-Yun Change; Chin-Ting Tu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Awareness of do-not-resuscitate orders: what do patients know and want?

Authors:  Claire Robinson; Sharlene Kolesar; Mark Boyko; Jonathan Berkowitz; Betty Calam; Marisa Collins
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Perspectives of Iranian medical students about do-not-resuscitate orders.

Authors:  Mahsa Ghajarzadeh; Roshanak Habibi; Neda Amini; Abbas Norouzi-Javidan; Seyed Hassan Emami-Razavi
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2013-09

6.  Nursing Roles and Strategies in End-of-Life Decision Making in Acute Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Judith A Adams; Donald E Bailey; Ruth A Anderson; Sharron L Docherty
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-02

7.  Patient and Health-Care Provider Interpretation of do not Resuscitate and do not Intubate.

Authors:  Heather Pirinea; Thomas Simunich; Daniel Wehner; John Ashurst
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.