Literature DB >> 961492

Assessment of the psychosocial outcome of severe head injury.

M R Bond.   

Abstract

Increasing numbers of those concerned with the primary treatment and later care of individuals who sustain head injuries are becoming interested in the development of methods for assessing the outcome of severe brain damage. In the past such methods seldom involved balanced consideration of the physical, mental and social sequelae of injury. Moreover rehabilitation, which should involve restoration of patients to their fullest physical, mental and social capability, is often biased towards the improvement of physical disability alone. The long lasting and chronically disabling mental changes which occur so frequently, and which tend to cause the greatest difficulties for patients in terms of their reintegration into society, usually receive scant attention. Assessment of outcome necessitates evaluation of the contribution of both physiogenic and psychogenic factors to the patient's mental state, and thus their respective contributions to the degree of social integration achieved. With these points in mind a pilot study was designed to evaluate three simple indices of outcome--namely neurophysical, mental and social assessment scales. The relation of each scale to the severity of brain damage, assessed in terms of post-traumatic amnesia, was examined. The relation of the scales to each other and to measures of cognitive function (the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) were also considered, Results from 56 severely brain injured patients reveals a clear cut relation between the duration of post-traumatic amnesia and the measures of disability devised. Further, social disability was related to the level of physical and mental handicap, but it was the latter which caused the most severe problems. The level of intellectual recovery was related to all scales of disability and to the duration of post-traumatic amnesia, although the latter proved to be a less accurate predictor of the ultimate degree of intellectual recovery than was expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 961492     DOI: 10.1007/BF01405863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  8 in total

1.  Cognitive recovery after severe head injury. 1. Serial testing on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.

Authors:  I A Mandleberg; D N Brooks
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  A follow-up study of 128 closed head injuries in twins using cotwins as controls.

Authors:  S J DENCKER
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand Suppl       Date:  1958

Review 3.  The psychiatric sequelae of head injury: a review.

Authors:  W A Lishman
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Severe head injuries. A six-year follow-up.

Authors:  T J Fahy; M H Irving; P Millac
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1967-09-02       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Memory and head injury.

Authors:  D N Brooks
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.254

6.  Rehabilitation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 0.729

7.  Prognosis of severe brain injury.

Authors:  O Heiskanen; P Sipponen
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 3.209

8.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage.

Authors:  B Jennett; M Bond
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Psychosocial outcome for the survivors of severe blunt head injury: the results from a consecutive series of 100 patients.

Authors:  R L Tate; J M Lulham; G A Broe; B Strettles; A Pfaff
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  The heterogeneity of social outcome following head injury.

Authors:  D Dodwell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Behavioural and psychosocial sequelae of severe closed head injury and regional cerebral blood flow: a SPECT study.

Authors:  W Oder; G Goldenberg; J Spatt; I Podreka; H Binder; L Deecke
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Effects of case management after severe head injury.

Authors:  R J Greenwood; T M McMillan; D N Brooks; G Dunn; D Brock; S Dinsdale; L D Murphy; J R Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-07

5.  Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Authors:  B Jennett; J Snoek; M R Bond; N Brooks
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Rehabilitation needs and participation restriction in patients with cognitive disorder in the chronic phase of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Hironobu Sashika; Kaoruko Takada; Naohisa Kikuchi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.