Literature DB >> 9614755

Comparative quantification of gastric electrical activity and electrogastrograms.

M P Mintchev1, K L Bowes.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare quantitatively the variability of gastric electrical activity (GEA) recorded from asymptomatic patients with implanted serosal electrodes and patients with implanted and cutaneous electrodes. Three pairs of electrodes were inserted into the gastric wall in six patients undergoing laparotomy for other reasons. Normal GEA was assessed visually once patients were tolerating a normal diet. Mean frequency (MF) values of the GEA signal in successive 256 s intervals were obtained. Standard deviations of the MF values for each separate channel of each patient were calculated. Probability density functions (pdfs) of these values were also obtained and compared. 36 1 h simultaneous recordings were made for three patients with implanted and cutaneous electrodes. The recordings were assessed both visually and with computer. A fast Hartley transform was used to obtain the dominant MF values in 256 s time intervals. These values were statistically evaluated for each channel. Normal internal GEA had a mean frequency of 2.5-3.75 cycles min-1 (cpm) and a standard deviation range of 0-0.45 cpm. Bell-shaped pdfs with coinciding maxima were observed in all these recordings, indicating normal electrical coupling. In the comparative 36 h study, using the above definitions of normality, different cutaneous recordings were found to reflect GEA with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 79%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9614755     DOI: 10.1007/bf02522864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  9 in total

1.  Electrical activity of the gastrointestinal tract as an indication of mechanical activity.

Authors:  E E DANIEL; K M CHAPMAN
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1963-01

2.  Effects of highly selective vagotomy on gastric myoelectrical activity. An electrogastrographic study.

Authors:  H Geldof; E J van der Schee; M van Blankenstein; A J Smout; L M Akkermans
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Biomedical signal processing (in four parts). Part 1. Time-domain methods.

Authors:  R E Challis; R I Kitney
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Extracting quantitative information from digital electrogastrograms.

Authors:  M P Mintchev; K L Bowes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Running spectrum analysis as an aid in the representation and interpretation of electrogastrographic signals.

Authors:  E J van der Schee; J L Grashuis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  The generation and conduction of activity in smooth muscle.

Authors:  E E Daniel; S Sarna
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 13.820

7.  What is measured in electrogastrography?

Authors:  A J Smout; E J van der Schee; J L Grashuis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Accuracy of cutaneous recordings of gastric electrical activity.

Authors:  M P Mintchev; Y J Kingma; K L Bowes
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Gastric electrical dysrhythmia following cholecystectomy in humans.

Authors:  F Pezzolla; G Riezzo; M A Maselli; I Giorgio
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.216

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Electrical activity from colon overlaps with normal gastric electrical activity in cutaneous recordings.

Authors:  Manuel A Amaris; Claudia P Sanmiguel; Daniel C Sadowski; Kenneth L Bowes; Martin P Mintchev
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Noninvasive assessment of the effects of glucagon on the gastric slow wave.

Authors:  L Alan Bradshaw; Jared A Sims; William O Richards
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Purnima Sharma; Govind Makharia; Rajeev Yadav; Sada Nand Dwivedi; Kishore Kumar Deepak
Journal:  J Smooth Muscle Res       Date:  2015
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.