Literature DB >> 9614741

Computer simulation of the impact of different dimensions of the stomach on the validity of electrogastrograms.

M P Mintchev1, K L Bowes.   

Abstract

The impact of the dimensions of the stomach on cutaneous recordings of gastric electrical activity (GEA) has not been adequately studied. The stomach was represented as a truncated conoid in a spherical coordinate system. The gastric electric field was modelled using a previously described methodology. Electrical potentials were calculated from sets of points simulating standard cutaneous recordings. The frequency of the signals was maintained at 3 cycles min-1 (period of repetition: 20 s), while the velocity of propagation of the depolarisation waves was reduced relative to the reduction in gastric dimensions. The signals were digitally contaminated with a random artificial artefact with a constant amplitude range of 0.2 mV, while the dimensions of the conoid (the circumferential radii and the length of the central axis) were decreased by factors of 1.5, two, four, six and eight. Simulated EGG signals were evaluated quantitatively. Simulated EGG records contaminated with random signals recorded from stomachs with decreasing dimensions exhibited non-linearly increasing standard deviations (p < 0.001). Randomly contaminated EGGs calculated from stomachs with dimensions reduced four, six and eight times were abnormal according to previously established quantitative criteria. Computer modelling indicated that gastric dimensions can significantly influence the validity of EGGs. These findings could be particularly important in a paediatric electrogastrography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9614741     DOI: 10.1007/bf02522850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  10 in total

1.  Electrogastrography in non-ulcer dyspepsia.

Authors:  S Cucchiara; G Riezzo; R Minella; F Pezzolla; I Giorgio; S Auricchio
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Conoidal dipole model of electrical field produced by the human stomach.

Authors:  M P Mintchev; K L Bowes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Impact of external factors on the stability of human electrogastrograms.

Authors:  M P Mintchev; K L Bowes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Extracting quantitative information from digital electrogastrograms.

Authors:  M P Mintchev; K L Bowes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Model to simulate the gastric electrical control and response activity on the stomach wall and on the abdominal surface.

Authors:  N Mirizzi; R Stella; U Scafoglieri
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Running spectrum analysis as an aid in the representation and interpretation of electrogastrographic signals.

Authors:  E J van der Schee; J L Grashuis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Electrogastrography in neonates.

Authors:  T Tomomasa; M Miyazaki; Y Nako; T Kuroume
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Role of electrogastrography and gastric impedance measurements in evaluation of gastric emptying and motility.

Authors:  A J Smout; H J Jebbink; L M Akkermans; P P Bruijs
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Accuracy of cutaneous recordings of gastric electrical activity.

Authors:  M P Mintchev; Y J Kingma; K L Bowes
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  The significance of electrogastrographically determined amplitudes--is there a correlation to sonographically measured antral mechanical contractions?

Authors:  B Pfaffenbach; B Wedmann; R J Adamek; M Wegener
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.000

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Surface current density mapping for identification of gastric slow wave propagation.

Authors:  L Alan Bradshaw; Leo K Cheng; William O Richards; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Electrogastrography in adults and children: the strength, pitfalls, and clinical significance of the cutaneous recording of the gastric electrical activity.

Authors:  Giuseppe Riezzo; Francesco Russo; Flavia Indrio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Polygonally Meshed Dipole Model Simulation of the Electrical Field Produced by the Stomach and Intestines.

Authors:  Masaki Kawano; Takahiro Emoto
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.238

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.