Literature DB >> 9613912

Nebulized budesonide and oral dexamethasone for treatment of croup: a randomized controlled trial.

T P Klassen1, W R Craig, D Moher, M H Osmond, H Pasterkamp, T Sutcliffe, L K Watters, P C Rowe.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The effectiveness of glucocorticoids for patients with croup is well established but it remains uncertain which glucocorticoid regimen is most effective.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of 3 glucocorticoid regimens in patients with croup.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with parallel design.
SETTING: Emergency departments of 2 Canadian pediatric tertiary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Children with a clinical syndrome consistent with croup, aged 3 months to 5 years, with a croup score of 2 or greater following at least 15 minutes of mist therapy.
INTERVENTIONS: Oral dexamethasone, 0.6 mg/kg, and nebulized placebo; oral placebo and nebulized budesonide, 2 mg; or oral dexamethasone, 0.6 mg/kg, and nebulized budesonide, 2 mg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Westley croup score (primary outcome), hospital admission rates, time spent in the emergency department, return visits to the emergency department, or ongoing symptoms at 1 week.
RESULTS: The mean change in the croup score from baseline to the final study assessment was -2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.6 to -2.0) in the budesonide group (n = 65), -2.4 (95% CI, -2.6 to -2.2) in the dexamethasone group (n = 69), and -2.4 (95% CI, -2.7 to -2.1) in the budesonide and dexamethasone group (n = 64, P = .70).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the similar outcomes in the 3 groups, oral dexamethasone is the preferred intervention because of its ease of administration, lower cost, and more widespread availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9613912     DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.20.1629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  20 in total

1.  Role of steroids in treatment of croup.

Authors:  K Chugh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Historical review of croup.

Authors:  V Marchessault
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2001-11

3.  Re: Croup in the paediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Candice L Bjornson; David W Johnson
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 4.  Croup in children.

Authors:  Candice L Bjornson; David W Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Historical review of croup.

Authors:  V Marchessault
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Glucocorticoids in the treatment of croup: barking up the right tree.

Authors:  T P Klassen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Croup.

Authors:  David Wyatt Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-09-29

8.  Local production of inflammatory mediators during childhood parainfluenza virus infection.

Authors:  Rana E El Feghaly; Lindsay McGann; Cynthia A Bonville; Patrick J Branigan; Manika Suryadevera; Helene F Rosenberg; Joseph B Domachowske
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 9.  Animal pneumoviruses: molecular genetics and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Andrew J Easton; Joseph B Domachowske; Helene F Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 10.  Croup.

Authors:  David Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.