Literature DB >> 9613780

Salvage autologous or allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma refractory to or relapsing after a first-line autograft?

J Mehta1, G Tricot, S Jagannath, D Ayers, S Singhal, D Siegel, K Desikan, N Munshi, A Fassas, S Mattox, D Vesole, J Crowley, B Barlogie.   

Abstract

Forty-two patients allografted for multiple myeloma after not having attained at least a partial remission (n = 19) or after having experienced disease progression (n = 23) following one autograft were compared with 42 pair-matched controls who underwent salvage autotransplantation under identical conditions. Autografted controls were matched closely for albumin, C-reactive protein, creatinine, disease sensitivity, duration of standard therapy prior to the first transplant, Ig isotype, karyotype, LDH, and response to the first transplant, but, in comparison to allografted patients, were older, had higher beta2-microglobulin, and had a shorter interval between the two transplants. The complete remission rate was 41% after allogeneic and 33% after autologous transplantation (P = NS). The 3-year probability of event-free survival was comparable for the two groups (25 +/- 8% after autografting and 20 +/- 8% after allografting). The 3-year probability of survival was significantly higher after autologous transplantation (54 +/- 8% vs 29 +/- 9%; P = 0.01). Twenty-one patients in the autograft group were alive 11-59 months (median 32) following the second transplant, while 15 patients in the allograft group were alive at 10-53 months (median 20). The 3-year probability of disease progression was significantly lower after allogeneic transplantation (31 +/- 10% vs 72 +/- 9%, P = 0.03). The 1-year probability of transplant-related mortality was significantly higher after allografting (43 +/- 8% vs 10 +/- 5%; P = 0.0001). We conclude that while autografting appears to be superior to allografting for salvage therapy of myeloma persisting or relapsing after one previous autotransplant in terms of overall survival, event-free survival is comparable due to significantly lower disease progression after allografting. Reduction in allograft-related toxicity can potentially improve the results of allogeneic transplantation significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9613780     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  19 in total

Review 1.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  N Raje; K C Anderson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-04

2.  Variable incidence of cyclosporine and FK-506 neurotoxicity in hematopoeitic malignancies and marrow conditions after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  Walter S Bartynski; Zella R Zeigler; Richard K Shadduck; John Lister
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Arsenic trioxide with ascorbic acid and high-dose melphalan: results of a phase II randomized trial.

Authors:  Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Rima M Saliba; Yago Nieto; Gaurav Parikh; Matteo Pelosini; Fatima B Khan; Roy B Jones; Chitra Hosing; Floralyn Mendoza; Donna M Weber; Michael Wang; Uday Popat; Amin Alousi; Paolo Anderlini; Richard E Champlin; Sergio Giralt
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: is there a future?

Authors:  B Dhakal; D H Vesole; P N Hari
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Salvage second hematopoietic cell transplantation in myeloma.

Authors:  Laura C Michaelis; Ayman Saad; Xiaobo Zhong; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Cesar O Freytes; David I Marks; Hillard M Lazarus; Jennifer M Bird; Leona Holmberg; Rammurti T Kamble; Shaji Kumar; Michael Lill; Kenneth R Meehan; Wael Saber; Jeffrey Schriber; Jason Tay; Dan T Vogl; Baldeep Wirk; Bipin N Savani; Robert P Gale; David H Vesole; Gary J Schiller; Muneer Abidi; Kenneth C Anderson; Taiga Nishihori; Matt E Kalaycio; Julie M Vose; Jan S Moreb; William Drobyski; Reinhold Munker; Vivek Roy; Armin Ghobadi; H Kent Holland; Rajneesh Nath; L Bik To; Angelo Maiolino; Adetola A Kassim; Sergio A Giralt; Heather Landau; Harry C Schouten; Richard T Maziarz; Joseph Mikhael; Tamila Kindwall-Keller; Patrick J Stiff; John Gibson; Sagar Lonial; Amrita Krishnan; Angela Dispenzieri; Parameswaran Hari
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, and International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Conference on Salvage Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Sergio Giralt; Laurent Garderet; Brian Durie; Gordon Cook; Gosta Gahrton; Benedetto Bruno; Paremesweran Hari; Henk Lokhorst; Phillip McCarthy; Amrita Krishnan; Pieter Sonneveld; Harmut Goldschmidt; Sundar Jagannath; Bart Barlogie; Maria Mateos; Peter Gimsing; Orhan Sezer; Joseph Mikhael; Jin Lu; Meletios Dimopoulos; Amitabha Mazumder; Antonio Palumbo; Rafat Abonour; Kenneth Anderson; Michel Attal; Joan Blade; Jenny Bird; Michele Cavo; Raymond Comenzo; Javier de la Rubia; Hermann Einsele; Ramon Garcia-Sanz; Jens Hillengass; Sarah Holstein; Hans Erik Johnsen; Douglas Joshua; Guenther Koehne; Shaji Kumar; Robert Kyle; Xavier Leleu; Sagar Lonial; Heinz Ludwig; Hareth Nahi; Anil Nooka; Robert Orlowski; Vincent Rajkumar; Anthony Reiman; Paul Richardson; Eloisa Riva; Jesus San Miguel; Ingemar Turreson; Saad Usmani; David Vesole; William Bensinger; Muzaffer Qazilbash; Yvonne Efebera; Mohamed Mohty; Christina Gasparreto; James Gajewski; Charles F LeMaistre; Chris Bredeson; Phillipe Moreau; Marcelo Pasquini; Nicolaus Kroeger; Edward Stadtmauer
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Second auto-SCT is safe and effective salvage therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R L Olin; D T Vogl; D L Porter; S M Luger; S J Schuster; D E Tsai; D L Siegel; R J Cook; P A Mangan; K Cunningham; E A Stadtmauer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Nonmyeloablative unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation to treat patients with poor-risk, relapsed, or refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  George E Georges; Michael B Maris; David G Maloney; Brenda M Sandmaier; Mohamed L Sorror; Judith A Shizuru; Thoralf Lange; Edward D Agura; Benedetto Bruno; Peter A McSweeney; Michael A Pulsipher; Thomas R Chauncey; Marco Mielcarek; Barry E Storer; Rainer Storb
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  A randomized phase II trial of fludarabine/melphalan 100 versus fludarabine/melphalan 140 followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Qaiser Bashir; Hassan Khan; Peter F Thall; Ping Liu; Nina Shah; Partow Kebriaei; Simrit Parmar; Betul Oran; Stefan Ciurea; Yago Nieto; Roy Jones; Chitra M Hosing; Uday R Popat; Yvonne T Dinh; Gabriela Rondon; Robert Z Orlowski; Jatin J Shah; Marcos De Lima; Elizabeth Shpall; Richard Champlin; Sergio Giralt; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Therapy strategies for multiple myeloma: current status.

Authors:  Heinz Gisslinger; Mathias Kees
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.