Literature DB >> 9613407

Informed consent: are we doing enough?

A P Armstrong1, A A Cole, R E Page.   

Abstract

We report our findings in a prospective, randomised study of patient recall of verbal versus written preoperative warnings. There were 132 patients in the verbal group and 137 in the written group, with a similar age and sex distribution in both groups. Four of the seven preoperative warnings were remembered significantly better by the group receiving the written warnings (P < 0.001-0.05). However, the mean number of warnings recalled was fewer than 3 in the verbal group, and fewer than 4 (P = 0.0057) in the written group (Mann-Whitney U-test). Patients given verbal warnings were less able to recall them than those receiving written warnings. The inference is that they entered into surgery less well informed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9613407     DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1226(97)90510-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  9 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca Sudore; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  [Teaching medical students informed consent].

Authors:  I Schleicher; S H van der Mei; J Mika; J G Kreuder
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Corrected Feedback: A Procedure to Enhance Recall of Informed Consent to Research among Substance Abusing Offenders.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Jason R Croft; Patricia L Arabia; Douglas B Marlowe
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2010-01-01

4.  Anaesthetists' and surgeons' attitudes towards informed consent in the UK: an observational study.

Authors:  A A B Jamjoom; S White; S M Walton; J G Hardman; I K Moppett
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 5.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  From the patient's perspective: is there a need to improve the quality of informed consent for surgery in training hospitals?

Authors:  Shamir O Cawich; Alan T Barnett; Ivor W Crandon; Samantha D Drew; Georgiana Gordon-Strachan
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

7.  The influence of written information during the consenting process on patients' recall of operative risks. A prospective randomised study.

Authors:  C Mauffrey; E M Prempeh; J John; G Vasario
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  ANAESTHETISTS' ATTITUDES AND PRACTICE OF INFORMED CONSENT IN NIGERIA.

Authors:  J O Olatosi; O O Adekola; N C Anaegbu; A Adesida; M K Rotimi
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

Review 9.  Open partial horizontal laryngectomies: is it time to adopt a modular form of consent for the intervention?

Authors:  L Giordano; D Di Santo; E Crosetti; A Bertolin; G Rizzotto; G Succo; M Bussi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.124

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.