Literature DB >> 9613229

Saccadic velocity and activation: development of a diagnostic tool for assessing energy regulation.

E App1, G Debus.   

Abstract

The hypothesis was tested that peak velocity of saccadic eye movements in visual motor tasks varies with variables related to energy regulation. The hypothesis is based on the cognitive-energetical performance model of Sanders. An experimental paradigm was developed in which saccadic peak velocity of task-relevant eye movements is measured while a choice reaction task is carried out. Confounding factors of saccadic amplitude and movement direction were controlled. The task was designed in such a way that in each trial subjects performed a target saccade towards an imperative stimulus and a return saccade after the manual response back to the centre of the screen. For both types of saccades the experimental variables were foreperiod duration (short versus long), knowledge of results (with versus without), postsaccadic demand (low versus high) and time on task (five 30-min intervals). In two experiments, there are main and interaction effects of the task variables on peak saccadic velocity. Return saccades are slower than target saccades, but not in the case of high postsaccadic demand. Knowledge of results increases peak saccadic velocity, but more so for return than for target saccades. Time on task leads to a decrease in peak saccadic velocity, which is much stronger for return than for target saccades; furthermore this effect is more pronounced after short than after long foreperiods. Peak saccadic velocity is changed within seconds. The results support the hypothesis. Peak saccadic velocity of task related eye movements reflects energy regulation during task performance. The paradigm will be developed as a diagnostic tool in workload measurement.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9613229     DOI: 10.1080/001401398186856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Envelope filter sequence to delete blinks and overshoots.

Authors:  Manuel Merino; Isabel María Gómez; Alberto J Molina
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.819

2.  Virtual Reality Experiments on Emotional Face Recognition Find No Evidence of Mood-Congruent Effects.

Authors:  Lan Zhong; Yamin Wang; Hong Kan; Jinhong Ding
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-09

3.  Voluntary modulation of saccadic peak velocity associated with individual differences in motivation.

Authors:  Kinan Muhammed; Edwin Dalmaijer; Sanjay Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Multiple levels of mental attentional demand modulate peak saccade velocity and blink rate.

Authors:  Valentina Bachurina; Marie Arsalidou
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-01-22

5.  Eye movements discriminate fatigue due to chronotypical factors and time spent on task--a double dissociation.

Authors:  Dario Cazzoli; Chrystalina A Antoniades; Christopher Kennard; Thomas Nyffeler; Claudio L Bassetti; René M Müri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.