H Britt1, M Angelis, E Harris. 1. Department of General Practice, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of morbidity data recorded by general practitioners (family physicians) on structured recording forms in active data collection systems. DESIGN: The consulting general practitioner recorded the problems managed at 347 video-taped doctor-patient contacts. Two observers independently viewed the video-tapes and completed a recording form for each. Problems were centrally coded, using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). SETTING: Primary health care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall distribution of the morbidity; positive agreement regarding the morbidity managed at matched contacts at three levels of specificity (chapter; chapter-component; specific rubric); agreement taking negative agreement into account using Cohen's Kappa. RESULTS: Overall distribution of morbidity did not differ between observers. Positive mean agreement was 78.8% at chapter level, 69.6% at chapter-component, and 55.9% at rubric level. Kappa statistics showed agreement better than chance in all chapters, but failed to reach significance at rubric level in three chapters. CONCLUSION: Morbidity data actively collected by GPs provide a reliable overview of morbidity managed in general practice. At a specific contact the morbidity recorded is reliable and valid at chapter level, and in most cases, at chapter-component level. At rubric level variance between practitioners in labelling the problem calls into question the validity and reliability of the data.
OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of morbidity data recorded by general practitioners (family physicians) on structured recording forms in active data collection systems. DESIGN: The consulting general practitioner recorded the problems managed at 347 video-taped doctor-patient contacts. Two observers independently viewed the video-tapes and completed a recording form for each. Problems were centrally coded, using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). SETTING: Primary health care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall distribution of the morbidity; positive agreement regarding the morbidity managed at matched contacts at three levels of specificity (chapter; chapter-component; specific rubric); agreement taking negative agreement into account using Cohen's Kappa. RESULTS: Overall distribution of morbidity did not differ between observers. Positive mean agreement was 78.8% at chapter level, 69.6% at chapter-component, and 55.9% at rubric level. Kappa statistics showed agreement better than chance in all chapters, but failed to reach significance at rubric level in three chapters. CONCLUSION: Morbidity data actively collected by GPs provide a reliable overview of morbidity managed in general practice. At a specific contact the morbidity recorded is reliable and valid at chapter level, and in most cases, at chapter-component level. At rubric level variance between practitioners in labelling the problem calls into question the validity and reliability of the data.
Authors: Olov Rolandsson; Margareta Norberg; Lennarth Nyström; Stefan Söderberg; Maria Svensson; Bernt Lindahl; Lars Weinehall Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Caro J T van Uden; Ron A G Winkens; Geertjan Wesseling; Hans F B M Fiolet; Onno C P van Schayck; Harry F J M Crebolder Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Henrik Schroll; René Depont Christensen; Janus Laust Thomsen; Morten Andersen; Søren Friborg; Jens Søndergaard Journal: Int J Family Med Date: 2012-07-24
Authors: Sven G Engström; Lennart Carlsson; Carl-Johan Ostgren; Gunnar H Nilsson; Lars A Borgquist Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2006-02-16 Impact factor: 3.295