Literature DB >> 9612147

Some clinical and radiographical features of submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. A 5-year follow-up study.

I Ericsson1, K Randow, K Nilner, A Petersson.   

Abstract

The present study reports on the results of a follow-up examination of patient material, 5 years after the installation of the fixed supraconstruction. The patient group comprised 11 individuals. Briefly, a split-mouth technique of treatment was used. In the right side of the mandible the traditional 2-step surgical approach for implant installation was used. In the left jaw quadrant a 1-step surgical procedure was used. A clinical and radiographical examination was performed 5 years after the initial connection of the supraconstruction to the implants. At the 5-year follow-up examination all 61 implants examined at the 18-month follow-up were still in service and found to be clinically stable irrespective of the surgical procedure used. Furthermore, the results of the present clinical and radiographical follow-up study demonstrate that the marginal bone level at implants placed anteriorly in the edentulous mandible and supporting fixed supraconstructions is stable between 18 and 60 months irrespective of whether placed according to a 1-step or 2-step surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9612147     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080509.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Scube2 expression extends beyond the central nervous system during mouse development.

Authors:  Guilherme M Xavier; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.611

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Yun Shane Chew; Paul Coulthard; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-23

3.  Marginal Bone Level Evaluation after Functional Loading Around Two Different Dental Implant Designs.

Authors:  Ko-Ning Ho; Eisner Salamanca; Hsi-Kuai Lin; Sheng-Yang Lee; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Clinical and radiographics results at 3 years of RCT with split-mouth design of submerged vs. nonsubmerged single laser-microgrooved implants in posterior areas.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Dario Di Nardo; Gianni Di Giorgio; Gabriele Miccoli; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-12-18

5.  Zygomatic approach with single-piece implants: A technical note.

Authors:  Vivek Gaur; Anita Gala Doshi; Lukasz Palka
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Comparison of the Marginal Bone Loss in One-stage versus Two-stage Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Rasoul Gheisari; Hesamuddin Eatemadi; Akram Alavian
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-12

7.  Placement of single tooth implant in healed socket with immediate temporization: Clinical study.

Authors:  Jeevan Lata; Monika Parmar
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.