Literature DB >> 9611007

Where's the high-grade cervical neoplasia? The importance of minimally abnormal Papanicolaou diagnoses.

W K Kinney1, M M Manos, L B Hurley, J E Ransley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relative contributions of the different abnormal Papanicolaou smear cytologic diagnoses in the Bethesda System to the subsequent histologic diagnosis of high-grade cervical neoplasia.
METHODS: A total of 46,009 nonpregnant female members of the Kaiser Permanente Health Plan, Northern California Region, were studied prospectively. The main outcome measures included routine Papanicolaou smear diagnoses and subsequent histologic diagnosis of colposcopically directed cervical tissue specimens.
RESULTS: Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) was the most common abnormal Papanicolaou diagnosis, representing 3.6% of the total number of smears. Of the total number of cases of histologically confirmed high-grade cervical neoplasia present in the population, the largest proportion (38.8%) was in women with smears showing ASCUS. Minimal abnormalities combined (ASCUS, atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) were coincident with 68.6% of the cases of histologic high-grade cervical neoplasia diagnosed in this routine screening population.
CONCLUSION: Recognition of the importance of equivocal and mild Papanicolaou test abnormalities in the subsequent diagnosis of high-grade cervical neoplasia emphasizes the need for accurate and cost-effective triage of the large population of women with minimally abnormal Papanicolaou diagnoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9611007     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00080-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  36 in total

1.  HPV testing for clarifying borderline cervical smear results.

Authors:  M M Manos
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-14

2.  Human papillomavirus testing and the management of women with mildly abnormal cervical smears: an observational study.

Authors:  G Rebello; N Hallam; G Smart; D Farquharson; J McCafferty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-14

Review 3.  [Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology].

Authors:  H Ikenberg
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  A Suggested Approach to Simplify and Improve Cervical Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 5.  Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  No evidence for synergy between human papillomavirus genotypes for the risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in a large population-based study.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Martha Nason; Mark Schiffman; Lori Dodd; William C Hunt; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 7.  Does the vaginal microbiota play a role in the development of cervical cancer?

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Anita Mitra; Anna-Barbara Moscicki
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 7.012

8.  Clinicopathological significance of atypical glandular cells on Pap smear.

Authors:  Sun-Suk Kim; Dong-Soo Suh; Ki-Hyung Kim; Man-Soo Yoon; Kyung-Un Choi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2013-03-12

9.  Anal dysplasia screening: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-06-01

10.  A study of Amplicor human papillomavirus DNA detection in the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Patti E Gravitt; Diane Solomon; Cosette M Wheeler; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.