Literature DB >> 9610998

Ring block for neonatal circumcision.

S Hardwick-Smith1, J M Mastrobattista, P A Wallace, M L Ritchey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a difference in the behavioral and physiologic response to circumcision can be demonstrated between neonates undergoing the procedure with ring block and those receiving no anesthesia.
METHODS: Forty healthy male newborns were assigned randomly to receive either ring block or no anesthesia. Indices of perceived pain including crying time, behavioral state, oxygen saturation, and heart and respiratory rates were recorded at baseline and at intervals during the circumcision. Infants were reassessed 2 minutes and 2 hours postoperatively.
RESULTS: Infants receiving ring block cried less than did controls (P < .001). Anesthetized infants had smaller increases in heart rate (P < .005) and demonstrated less arousal (P < .005) during each operative interval. For all operative intervals combined, anesthetized infants had a smaller decrease in oxygen saturation (P < .001) and a smaller increase in respiratory rate (P = .005) than did controls. Two minutes postoperatively, anesthetized infants had returned to their baseline behavioral state, whereas controls remained significantly more aroused (P < .005). Two hours postoperatively, there were no significant differences in any variables between the groups, nor between each group and its baseline. There were no complications related to anesthesia administration.
CONCLUSION: Neonatal circumcision causes behavioral and physiologic changes consistent with the perception of pain. Ring block is an effective method of anesthesia for this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9610998     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00093-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pain management for neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  A Taddio
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Male circumcision: towards a World Health Organisation normative practice in resource limited settings.

Authors:  Tim Hargreave
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  Orit C Stolik-Dollberg; Shaul Dollberg
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2005-05-22       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 4.  Pain relief for neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  B Brady-Fryer; N Wiebe; J A Lander
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

5.  Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nick Zavras; Stella Tsamoudaki; Efstratios Christianakis; Demetrios Schizas; Emmanuel Pikoulis; Helen Kyritsi; George Chrousos
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.