Literature DB >> 9610856

In-vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements.

K Yoshida1, M Tanagawa, M Atsuta.   

Abstract

The solubility of resin luting cement remains unknown although the use of resin luting cement for routine cementation of restorations has increased. The purpose of this in-vitro study was to compare the solubilities of three resin cements currently in clinical use with three brands of conventional luting agents. The three resin luting cements, All-Bond C&B (AB, Bisco) Panavia 21 (P21, Kuraray), and Super-Bond C&B (SB, Sun-Medical), and the three conventional luting agents, Elite Cement 100 (EC, zinc phosphate cement, GC), HY-Bond Carbo-plus Cement (HCP, polycarboxylate cement, Shofu), and Fuji I (FI, glass-ionomer cement, GC) were used in this study. A modification of the ADA specification test was adopted to evaluate the solubilities of luting cements. The two types of media (distilled water and pH 4.0 lactic acid solution) in which specimens were stored for 30 days were prepared. The four luting cements, EC, FI, AB, and P21, were more soluble in lactic acid solution than in distilled water. Resin luting cements were markedly less soluble than conventional luting agents when placed in fresh lactic acid solution (0.001 mol/L) at pH 4.0 every 24 h over a 30-day period. The solubility rates of luting cements could be fitted to mathematical expressions which indicated that the solubilities increased linearly or logarithmically with immersion period. Fixed prosthodontic restorations cemented with resin luting cement may be capable of withstanding long-term clinical use compared with conventional luting agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9610856     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1998.00228.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  6 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.

Authors:  Siddharam M Patil; Vikas B Kamble; Raviraj G Desai; Kashinath C Arabbi; Ved Prakash
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

2.  The long-term interaction of dental cements with lactic acid solutions.

Authors:  J W Nicholson; B Czarnecka; H Limanowska-Shaw
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Effects of glass ionomer cements on bone tissue.

Authors:  P Lucksanasombool; W A J Higgs; R J E D Higgs; M V Swain; C R Howlett
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Characterization of adsorbed silane on fillers used in dental composite restoratives and its effect on composite properties.

Authors:  A Karmaker; A Prasad; N K Sarkar
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.727

5.  Evaluation and comparison of the effect of different surface treatment modifications on the shear bond strength of a resin cement to titanium: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Tahsin Mansur Veljee; C S Shruthi; R Poojya
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  The Comparison of Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Four Different Resin Luting Cements in Different Storage Media.

Authors:  Rashin Giti; Mahroo Vojdani; Jaafar Abduo; Rafat Bagheri
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2016-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.