Literature DB >> 9610657

Prognostic factors of renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis.

Y Yasunaga1, M Shin, T Miki, A Okuyama, K Aozasa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To establish appropriate therapeutic modalities for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), informations on the factors affecting prognosis of patients are essential. For this purpose, multivariate analysis including a large set of variables is necessary.
METHODS: Prognostic significance of 14 clinical factors and 19 histologic factors including counting of silver-stained nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) were evaluated in 96 patients. Age of patients ranged from 41 to 85 (median 59) yr with a male to female ratio of 4:1. The tumors were staged based on the TNM classification as follows: 7 in stage I, 58 in stage II, 15 in stage III, and 11 in stage IV.
RESULTS: The overall and metastasis-free survival rates in all patients were 80.1% and 72.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model performed on the factors proved to be significant at the univariate analysis. Univariate analysis revealed four clinical factors including presence of macroscopic hematuria, symptoms such as pain and palpable abdominal mass, anemia, and adjuvant therapy, and nine histologic factors, including AgNOR count, to be significant for survival. Multivariate analysis showed that anemia, pathological stage, and AgNOR count were independent factors for overall survival of patients. The AgNOR count, in particular, is the only predictive factor for metastasis-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Among various clinicopathological factors, anemia, pathological stage, and AgNOR count are significant prognosticators of RCC. The AgNOR count is also predictive factor for metastasis-free survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9610657     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199805)68:1<11::aid-jso4>3.0.co;2-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  7 in total

1.  The Prognostic Factors for Patients with pT1a Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jong Min Kim; Phil Hyun Song; Hyun Tae Kim; Tong Choon Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-04-20

Review 2.  Classical pathology versus molecular pathology in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Peggy Soung Sullivan; JianYu Rao; Liang Cheng; Richard J Cote
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Analysis of Argyrophilic Nucleolar Organizer Regions (AgNORs) in Acute Leukemia in Adults.

Authors:  Małgorzata Gajewska; Elżbieta Rutkowska; Iwona Kwiecień; Piotr Rzepecki; Kazimierz Sułek
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Cyclooxygenase-2 expression: does it have a probable role in tumorigenesis mechanisms of renal cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Sinan Sozen; Serhat Gurocak; Ozlem Erdem; Cenk Acar; Yakup Kordan; Gulen Akyol; Turgut Alkibay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Cytoplasmic sequestration of p27 via AKT phosphorylation in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinhee Kim; Eric Jonasch; Angela Alexander; John D Short; Shengli Cai; Sijin Wen; Dimitra Tsavachidou; Pheroze Tamboli; Bogdan A Czerniak; Kim Anh Do; Kevin J Wu; Laura A Marlow; Christopher G Wood; John A Copland; Cheryl Lyn Walker
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  VEGF, COX-2, and PCNA expression in renal cell carcinoma subtypes and their prognostic value.

Authors:  Ayhan Dirim; Asuman Nihan Haberal; Mehmet Resit Goren; Mehmet Ilteris Tekin; Levent Peskircioglu; Beyhan Demirhan; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Cyclooxygenase-2 and p53 expression as prognostic indicators in conventional renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Dae Sung Cho; Hee Jae Joo; Dong Keun Oh; Ji Hun Kang; Young Soo Kim; Kyi Beom Lee; Se Joong Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 2.759

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.