Literature DB >> 9610117

Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.

D L Hintzman1, D A Caulton, D J Levitin.   

Abstract

Two experiments tested the hypothesis that the time course of retrieval from memory is different for familiarity and recall. The response-signal method was used to compare memory retrieval dynamics in yes-no recognition memory, as a measure of familiarity, with those of list discrimination, as a measure of contextual recall. Responses were always made with regard to membership in two previous study lists. In Experiment 1 an exclusion task requiring positive responses to words from one list and negative responses to new words and words from the nontarget list was used. In Experiment 2, recognition and list discrimination were separate tasks. Retrieval curves from both experiments were consistent, showing that the minimal retrieval time for recognition was about 100 msec faster than that for list discrimination. Repetition affected asymptotic performance but had no reliable effects on retrieval dynamics in either the recognition or the list-discrimination task.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9610117     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models.

Authors:  S D Gronlund; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory.

Authors:  A V Reed
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Comparison of the retrieval of item versus spatial position information.

Authors:  S D Gronlund; M B Edwards; D D Ohrt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

5.  Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions.

Authors:  J S Janowsky; A P Shimamura; L R Squire
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation.

Authors:  T Curran; D L Hintzman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Semantic memory retrieval: analysis by speed accuracy tradeoff functions.

Authors:  A T Corbett; W A Wickelgren
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Amnesia and recognition memory: a re-analysis of psychometric data.

Authors:  J P Aggleton; C Shaw
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Frontal-lobe contribution to recency judgements.

Authors:  B Milner; P Corsi; G Leonard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  31 in total

1.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis.

Authors:  B McElree; P O Dolan; L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring.

Authors:  M C Steffens; A Buchner; H Martensen; E Erdfelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

3.  Associative recognition: a case of recall-to-reject processing.

Authors:  C M Rotello; E Heit
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

4.  Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  T Curran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

5.  Memory for detail in item versus associative recognition.

Authors:  A M Cleary; T Curran; R L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

6.  Memory for unidentified items: evidence for the use of letter information in familiarity processes.

Authors:  A M Cleary; R L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

7.  Model of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex.

Authors:  R Bogacz; M W Brown; C Giraud-Carrier
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Human memory reconsolidation can be explained using the temporal context model.

Authors:  Per B Sederberg; Samuel J Gershman; Sean M Polyn; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

Review 9.  Evidence concerning how neurons of the perirhinal cortex may effect familiarity discrimination.

Authors:  M W Brown; Z I Bashir
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Judgments of recency and their relation to recognition memory.

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.