Literature DB >> 9607387

Compliance and antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine compared with nifedipine slow-release.

C Mounier-Vehier1, C Bernaud, A Carré, B Lequeuche, J M Hotton, J C Charpentier.   

Abstract

Poor compliance is a principal cause of treatment failure in hypertensive patients. Once-daily dosing improves compliance, but 24-h antihypertensive activity should be provided. The compliance, efficacy, and safety of amlodipine and nifedipine slow-release (SR) were compared in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension recruited among 24 centers in France. After a 2-week washout period, 103 patients were randomized to 12 weeks of 5 to 10 amlodipine mg once daily (n = 55) or 20 mg nifedipine SR twice daily (n = 48). Compliance was calculated by electronic drug monitoring. Efficacy was measured by ambulatory and casual BP recordings. Patients receiving amlodipine demonstrated better compliance than patients receiving nifedipine SR with respect to compliance index (the total number of doses taken divided by the total number of doses prescribed, expressed as a percentage; 98.3% v 87%; P < .0001), days on which the correct number of doses were taken (92.5% v 74.8%; P < .0001), and prescribed doses taken on schedule (88.7% v 71.6%; P < .0001). Absolute and relative therapeutic coverage were higher in patients receiving amlodipine than nifedipine SR (P < .0001). Mean SBP and DBP decreased equally in both groups, although amlodipine offered better BP control compared with nifedipine SR at specific times of day. Fewer patients had high nocturnal SBP with amlodipine (39.3%) than nifedipine SR (71.4%; P = .042). Adverse events and treatment withdrawals occurred less frequently in amlodipine-treated patients than in nifedipine SR-treated patients. Amlodipine (5 to 10 mg) once daily provides improved compliance, better 24-h BP control, and fewer adverse events than 20 mg nifedipine SR twice daily in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9607387     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00485-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  7 in total

Review 1.  Some economic consequences of noncompliance.

Authors:  J Urquhart
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Hypertension and current issues in compliance and patient outcomes.

Authors:  T M Zyczynski; K S Coyne
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Benefits of once-daily therapies in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  John M Flack; Samar A Nasser
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-12-21

4.  Safety of Antihypertensive Medications in Pregnancy: Living With Uncertainty.

Authors:  Line Malha; Phyllis August
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Low-dose dextromethorphan, a NADPH oxidase inhibitor, reduces blood pressure and enhances vascular protection in experimental hypertension.

Authors:  Tao-Cheng Wu; Chih-Yu Chao; Shing-Jong Lin; Jaw-Wen Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Identification and assessment of adherence-enhancing interventions in studies assessing medication adherence through electronically compiled drug dosing histories: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jenny Demonceau; Todd Ruppar; Paulus Kristanto; Dyfrig A Hughes; Emily Fargher; Przemyslaw Kardas; Sabina De Geest; Fabienne Dobbels; Pawel Lewek; John Urquhart; Bernard Vrijens
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Interventions for improving adherence to treatment in patients with high blood pressure in ambulatory settings.

Authors:  K Schroeder; T Fahey; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.