Literature DB >> 9606887

[Checklist for methodological quality of guidelines. A contribution to quality promotion of medical guidelines].

G Ollenschläger1, A Helou, L Kostovic-Cilic, M Perleth, H H Raspe, O Rienhoff, H K Selbmann, U Oesingmann.   

Abstract

The society of physicians of Germany and the society of panel physicians laid down in the "assessment criteria for guidelines in medical care" what kind of demands the medical selfadministration makes on guidelines. This measure also had the goal to support and strengthen the efforts of the AWMF for guidelines of high value. On the basis of these assessment criteria, a tool was compiled for the systematic registration and documentation of quality criteria for good guidelines for the first time in areas of German language. This check list is guided by the structure and content of the "Criteria for Appraisal for National Guidelines" by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9606887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich        ISSN: 1431-7621


  3 in total

1.  Consensus conferences must include a systematic search and categorization of the evidence.

Authors:  S Sauerland; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Problems of evidence-based medicine in psychopharmacotherapy: problems of evidence grading and of the evidence basis for complex clinical decision making].

Authors:  H-J Möller; W Maier
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  The development of guidelines for the treatment of patients with mental disorders under particular consideration of rehabilitative aspects.

Authors:  Cathrin Büscher; Birgit Watzke; Uwe Koch; Holger Schulz
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2004-07-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.