Literature DB >> 9606280

Limited tumor involvement found at multiple endocrine neoplasia type I pancreatic exploration: can it be predicted by preoperative tumor localization?

B Skogseid1, K Oberg, G Akerström, B Eriksson, J E Westlin, E T Janson, H Eklöf, A Elvin, C Juhlin, J Rastad.   

Abstract

Radiologically demonstrable pancreatic endocrine tumors are a frequent requirement for exploration in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN-I). Such delayed intervention is accompanied by a 30% to 50% incidence of pancreatic endocrine metastases. This study explores biochemical tumor markers and operative findings in relation to preoperative pancreatic radiology in 25 MEN-I patients. They underwent pancreatic surgery with (n = 19) or without (n = 6) radiologic signs of primary tumor and absence of metastases upon conventional examination, including OctreoScan testing (n = 10). Biochemical diagnosis required an increasing elevation of at least two independent pancreatic tumor markers. Tumor diameters averaged 1.1 cm (0-5 cm) and 0.9 cm (0.2-1.5 cm) in the patients with and without positive preoperative radiology, respectively. These investigations never displayed more than one of the consistently multiple tumors, and the results were falsely positive in 26%. Preoperatively unidentified regional or hepatic metastases were found at surgical exploration in 26% of patients with radiologic localization and in none of the others. Limited pancreatic tumor involvement necessitated intraoperative absence of metastases and pancreatic lesions </= 1 cm in diameter on palpation, intraoperative ultrasonography, and microscopy. It occurred in 37% and 50% of the patients with and without radiologic tumor localization, respectively. The number of positive tumor markers was similar for patients with limited and major disease (2.3 vs. 2.7), whereas four or more such markers were found in all those with malignancies. The mean marker level was higher in patients with radiologically demonstrable tumors and lower in those with limited disease, but with a substantial overlap. OctreoScan testing was negative in all cases with limited disease and was the single most sensitive method (75%) in the others. Limited pancreatic disease could not be identified preoperatively, and the present means of biochemical pancreatic tumor identification invariably involved the presence of at least one lesion >/= 7 mm in diameter. Conventional pancreatic imaging is insensitive and nonspecific for recognizing even substantial pancreatic tumors associated with MEN-I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9606280     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  The MEN 1 syndrome: the actual role of genetic testing on the timing and extent of surgery.

Authors:  H Dralle
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Epidemiology data on 108 MEN 1 patients from the GTE with isolated nonfunctioning tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  Frederic Triponez; David Dosseh; Pierre Goudet; Patrick Cougard; Catherine Bauters; Arnaud Murat; Guillaume Cadiot; Patricia Niccoli-Sire; Jean-Alain Chayvialle; Alain Calender; Charles A G Proye
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Inherited pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes: advances in molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and controversies.

Authors:  Robert T Jensen; Marc J Berna; David B Bingham; Jeffrey A Norton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  [Prophylactic pancreas surgery].

Authors:  P Langer; M Rothmund; D K Bartsch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Preoperative diagnosis of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Ji Li; Guopei Luo; Deliang Fu; Chen Jin; Sijie Hao; Feng Yang; Xiaoyi Wang; Lie Yao; Quanxing Ni
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Management of pancreatic endocrine tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Authors:  Maria A Kouvaraki; Suzanne E Shapiro; Gilbert J Cote; Jeffrey E Lee; James C Yao; Steven G Waguespack; Robert F Gagel; Douglas B Evans; Nancy D Perrier
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Is surgery beneficial for MEN1 patients with small (< or = 2 cm), nonfunctioning pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumor? An analysis of 65 patients from the GTE.

Authors:  Frederic Triponez; Pierre Goudet; David Dosseh; Patrick Cougard; Catherine Bauters; Arnaud Murat; Guillaume Cadiot; Patricia Niccoli-Sire; Alain Calender; Charles A G Proye
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  [Zollinger-Ellison syndrome].

Authors:  V Fendrich; D K Bartsch; P Langer; A Zielke; M Rothmund
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Duodenopancreatic resections in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Authors:  T C Lairmore; V Y Chen; M K DeBenedetti; W E Gillanders; J A Norton; G M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Prospective evaluation of imaging procedures for the detection of pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumors in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Authors:  Peter Langer; Peter H Kann; Volker Fendrich; Gerd Richter; Saskia Diehl; Matthias Rothmund; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.