Literature DB >> 9606247

Circumcision practice patterns in the United States.

H J Stang1, L W Snellman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine 1) the performing of circumcision by medical specialty, gender, and years of practice; 2) the pattern of anesthetic use for this procedure; and 3) the reasons physicians cite for not using anesthesia.
DESIGN: A total of 3066 questionnaires were received from a mailing to a representative sampling of physicians stratified by specialty and geographic location.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent (1768) of the questionnaires were returned and interpretable from the following specialists: pediatricians (PEDs), 73% (n = 691); family practitioners (FPs), 52% (n = 464); and obstetricians (OBs), 51% (n = 623). Of the respondents, 956 (54%) perform at least one circumcision per month (35% of PEDs; 60% of FPs; 70% of OBs). Of the physicians performing circumcisions, 45% use anesthesia (71% of PEDs; 56% of FPs; 25% of OBs). Of physicians using anesthesia, 85% use dorsal penile nerve block. A significantly higher percentage of male physicians (57%) are performing circumcisions than are females (45%), but there was no difference in the percent using anesthesia. Recently trained PEDs and FPs were more likely to use anesthetics than were their older colleagues, but OB use of pain relief was independent of their practice longevity. Physicians in the western states were significantly more likely to use anesthesia than were other physicians from the rest of the United States. Respondents who did not use anesthesia cited "concern over adverse drug effects" (54%) followed by "procedure does not warrant anesthesia" (44%) as the most common explanations.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of PEDs are performing circumcisions, and they are most likely to use anesthesia (71%), followed by FPs (56%), then OBs (25%). With recent recognition of the importance of pain reduction in neonatal procedures and the lack of substantiated contraindications to newborn anesthetic use, additional education of current practitioners, residents, and parents is required to increase the use of anesthesia for circumcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9606247     DOI: 10.1542/peds.101.6.e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  5 in total

1.  The impact of the application of a penile block before circumcision on the postoperative FLACC score and analgesic requirement.

Authors:  Sacit Nuri Görgel; Banu Erten Tol
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-03

2.  Neonatal circumcision and prematurity are associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

Authors:  Eran Elhaik
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2019-01-09

3.  Critical evaluation of contrasting evidence on whether male circumcision has adverse psychological effects: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Stephen Moreton; Stefan A Bailis; Guy Cox; John N Krieger
Journal:  J Evid Based Med       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 4.  Pain relief for neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  B Brady-Fryer; N Wiebe; J A Lander
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

5.  Declining rates in male circumcision amidst increasing evidence of its public health benefit.

Authors:  Zohar Mor; Charlotte K Kent; Robert P Kohn; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.