Literature DB >> 9605913

Evaluation of benign vs malignant hepatic lesions with positron emission tomography.

D Delbeke1, W H Martin, M P Sandler, W C Chapman, J K Wright, C W Pinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In most malignant cells, the relatively low level of glucose-6-phosphatase leads to accumulation and trapping of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) intracellularly, allowing the visualization of increased uptake compared with normal cells.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of FDG positron emission tomography (PET) to differentiate benign from malignant hepatic lesions and to determine in which types of hepatic tumors PET can help evaluate stage, monitor response to therapy, and detect recurrence.
DESIGN: Prospective blinded-comparison clinical cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital and clinic. PATIENTS: One hundred ten consecutive referred patients with hepatic lesions 1 cm or larger on screening computed tomographic (CT) images who were seen for evaluation and potential resection underwent PET imaging. There were 60 men and 50 women with a mean (+/-SD) age of 59 +/- 14 years. Follow-up was 100%.
INTERVENTIONS: A PET scan using static imaging was performed on all patients. The PET scan imaging and biopsy, surgery, or both were performed, providing pathological samples within 2 months of PET imaging. All PET images were correlated with CT scan to localize the lesion. However, PET investigators were unaware of any previous interpretation of the CT scan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual interpretation, lesion-to-normal liver background (L/B) ratio of radioactivity, and standard uptake value (SUV) were correlated with pathological diagnosis.
RESULTS: All (100%) liver metastases from adenocarcinoma and sarcoma primaries in 66 patients and all cholangiocarcinomas in 8 patients had increased uptake values, L/B ratios greater than 2, and an SUV greater than 3.5. Hepatocellular carcinoma had increased FDG uptake in 16 of 23 patients and poor uptake in 7 patients. All benign hepatic lesions (n = 23), including adenoma and fibronodular hyperplasia, had poor uptake, an L/B ratio of less than 2, and an SUV less than 3.5, except for 1 of 3 abscesses that had definite uptake.
CONCLUSIONS: The PET technique using FDG static imaging was useful to differentiate malignant from benign lesions in the liver. Limitations include false-positive results in a minority of abscesses and false-negative results in a minority of hepatocellular carcinoma. The PET technique was useful in tumor staging and detection of recurrence, as well as monitoring response to therapy for all adenocarcinomas and sarcomas and most hepatocellular carcinomas. Therefore, pretherapy PET imaging is recommended to help assess new hepatic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9605913     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.5.510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  57 in total

1.  Liver-specific contrast agent-enhanced magnetic resonance and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography findings of hepatocellular adenoma: report of a case.

Authors:  Tatsuaki Sumiyoshi; Michihisa Moriguchi; Hideyuki Kanemoto; Kouiku Asakura; Keiko Sasaki; Teiichi Sugiura; Takashi Mizuno; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  18F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  B B Chin; R L Wahl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Update of PET and PET/CT for hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies.

Authors:  Dominique Delbeke; William H Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Comparison between two super-resolution implementations in PET imaging.

Authors:  Guoping Chang; Tinsu Pan; Feng Qiao; John W Clark; Osama R Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Focal fat mimicking multiple hepatic metastases on FDG PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Maurice H Zissen; Andrew Quon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with liver metastases.

Authors:  Siew C Chua; Ashley M Groves; Irfan Kayani; Leon Menezes; Svetislav Gacinovic; Yong Du; Jamshed B Bomanji; Peter J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  TNM staging with FDG-PET/CT in patients with primary head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Veit-Haibach; Christopher Luczak; Isabel Wanke; Markus Fischer; Thomas Egelhof; Thomas Beyer; Gerlinde Dahmen; Andreas Bockisch; Sandra Rosenbaum; Gerald Antoch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α-inactivated hepatocellular adenomas exhibit high (18)F-fludeoxyglucose uptake associated with glucose-6-phosphate transporter inactivation.

Authors:  Kumi Ozaki; Kenichi Harada; Noboru Terayama; Osamu Matsui; Satoshi Saitoh; Yoshito Tomimaru; Takeshi Fujii; Toshifumi Gabata
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  FDG PET as a prognostic predictor in the early post-therapeutic evaluation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Higashi; Etsuro Hatano; Iwao Ikai; Ryuichi Nishii; Yuji Nakamoto; Koichi Ishizu; Tsuyoshi Suga; Hidekazu Kawashima; Kaori Togashi; Satoru Seo; Koji Kitamura; Yasutsugu Takada; Yasuji Takada; Shinji Uemoto; Shinji Kamimoto
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Diagnostic and therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Francesco Bellissimo; Marilia Rita Pinzone; Bruno Cacopardo; Giuseppe Nunnari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.