Literature DB >> 9605783

Elderly patients receive less aggressive medical and invasive management of unstable angina: potential impact of practice guidelines.

R P Giugliano1, C A Camargo, D M Lloyd-Jones, J D Zagrodsky, J D Alexis, K A Eagle, V Fuster, C J O'Donnell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) released a practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of unstable angina in 1994.
OBJECTIVE: To examine practice variation across the age spectrum in the management of patients hospitalized with unstable angina 2 years before release of the AHCPR guideline.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort.
SETTING: Urban academic hospital. PATIENTS: All nonreferral patients diagnosed as having unstable angina who were hospitalized directly from the emergency department to the intensive care or telemetry unit between October 1, 1991, and September 30, 1992. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of eligible patients receiving medical treatment concordant with 8 important AHCPR guideline recommendations.
RESULTS: Half of the 280 patients were older than 66 years; women were older than men on average (70 vs 64 years; P<.001). After excluding those with contraindications to therapy, patients in the oldest quartile (age, 75.20-93.37 years) were less likely than younger patients to receive aspirin (P<.009), beta-blockers (P<.04), and referral for cardiac catheterization (P<.001). Overall guideline concordance weighted for the number of eligible patients declined with increasing age (87.4%, 87.4%, 84.0%, and 74.9% for age quartiles 1 to 4, respectively; chi2, P<.001). Increasing age, the presence of congestive heart failure at presentation, a history of congestive heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, increasing comorbidity, and elevated creatinine concentration were associated with care that was less concordant with AHCPR guideline recommendations; only age and congestive heart failure at presentation remained significant in the multivariate analysis (odds ratios, 1.28 per decade [95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.61] and 3.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.57-6.36], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients were less likely to receive standard therapies for unstable angina before release of the 1994 AHCPR guideline. Patients presenting with congestive heart failure also received care that was more discordant with guideline recommendations. The AHCPR guideline allows identification of patients who receive nonstandard care and, if applied to those patients with the greatest likelihood to benefit, could lead to improved health care delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9605783     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.10.1113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  17 in total

Review 1.  The elderly in the emergency department: a critical review of problems and solutions.

Authors:  F Salvi; V Morichi; A Grilli; R Giorgi; G De Tommaso; P Dessì-Fulgheri
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Attitudes toward practice guidelines among intensive care unit personnel: a cross-sectional anonymous survey.

Authors:  Dave Quiros; Susan Lin; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.210

3.  Research priorities for high-quality geriatric emergency care: medication management, screening, and prevention and functional assessment.

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Kennon Heard; Scott Wilber; Adit A Ginde; Kirk Stiffler; Lowell W Gerson; Neal S Wenger; Douglas K Miller
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Survival and changes in physical ability after coronary revascularization for octa-nonagenerian patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Kuniyuki Shirasawa; Myung-Woo Hwang; Yoshio Sasaki; Shinichi Takeda; Katsura Inenaga-Kitaura; Yasushi Kitaura; Chuichi Kawai
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Early and pre-discharge aspirin administration among patients with acute myocardial infarction: current clinical practice and trends in the United States.

Authors:  R C Becker; M Burns; J M Gore; C Lambrew; W French; W J Rogers
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Intervention in Older Persons with Acute Coronary Syndrome-Part I.

Authors:  Brett C Sheridan; Sally C Stearns; Mark W Massing; George A Stouffer; Laura P D'Arcy; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  Clin Geriatr       Date:  2008-10

7.  Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the intensive care unit improved both guideline adherence and glucose regulation.

Authors:  Emmy Rood; Robert Jan Bosman; Johan Ids van der Spoel; Paul Taylor; Durk Freark Zandstra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Coronary artery disease: to cath or not to cath? When and how best to cath: those are the remaining questions.

Authors:  Roberta Rossini; Giuseppe Musumeci; Eliano Pio Navarese; Giuseppe Tarantini
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-02-17

9.  Outcome of older patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Andrés Esteban; Antonio Anzueto; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Inmaculada Alía; E Wesley Ely; Laurent Brochard; Thomas E Stewart; Carlos Apezteguía; Martin J Tobin; Peter Nightingale; Dimitrios Matamis; Jorge Pimentel; Freki Abroug
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-28       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Rates and timing of central venous cannulation among patients with sepsis and respiratory arrest admitted by the emergency department*.

Authors:  Daniel Theodoro; Pamela L Owens; Margaret A Olsen; Victoria Fraser
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.