Literature DB >> 9605532

Spectral and polarization sensitivity of photocurrents of amphibian rods in the visible and ultraviolet.

A G Palacios1, R Srivastava, T H Goldsmith.   

Abstract

Photocurrents from isolated rods of adults and sub-adults of three species of amphibians, Rana pipiens, Ambystoma tigrinum, and Xenopus laevis, were measured with suction pipette electrodes. The intensity for a half-maximal response was 0.91+/-0.48 photons microm(-2) flash(-1) (mean +/- S.D., 10-ms flashes) for Rana, 0.92+/-0.44 for Ambystoma, and 6.14+/-1.33 for Xenopus. The mean number of photoisomerizations at half-saturation was 22+/-12 for Rana, 50+/-24 for Ambystoma, and 221+/-48 for Xenopus. The photocurrent per photoisomerization is several times smaller in Xenopus rods than in the other two species. Spectral sensitivity was measured from 277-737 nm with light polarized both parallel and perpendicular to the planes of the membrane disks. Dichroism fell in the near UV and was absent in the region of absorption by tryptophan and tyrosine. Maximum sensitivity of Rana was at 503.9+/-2.6 nm (n = 86), and of Ambystoma, 505.8+/-1.8 nm (n = 24). Animals from these same batches that were sampled by HPLC had no 3-dehydroretinal (retinal2). Xenopus containing about 94% retinal2 and 6% retinal1 had lambda(max) at 519.3+/-2.7 nm (n = 11). Spectral position of the beta-band, estimated by the method of Stavenga et al. (1993), appears to be at longer wavelengths in amphibian photoreceptors than in other vertebrates. Fits of log sensitivity to a normalized-frequency template that tracks the long-wavelength tail of the alpha-band (Lamb, 1995) show that the rod pigments of Rana and Ambystoma are slightly narrower than those found in the photoreceptors of fish and mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9605532     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523898152136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  7 in total

1.  Spectral tuning in salamander visual pigments studied with dihydroretinal chromophores.

Authors:  C L Makino; M Groesbeek; J Lugtenburg; D A Baylor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction.

Authors:  Vladimir Kefalov; Yingbin Fu; Nicholas Marsh-Armstrong; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Spectral sensitivities of photoreceptors and their role in colour discrimination in the green-backed firecrown hummingbird (Sephanoides sephaniodes).

Authors:  Gonzalo Herrera; Juan Cristóbal Zagal; Marcelo Diaz; Maria José Fernández; Alex Vielma; Michel Cure; Jaime Martinez; Francisco Bozinovic; Adrián G Palacios
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Rod sensitivity during Xenopus development.

Authors:  Wei-Hong Xiong; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Photoreceptor spectral sensitivity in the bumblebee, Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Authors:  Peter Skorupski; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Cambrian origin for vertebrate rods.

Authors:  Sabrina Asteriti; Sten Grillner; Lorenzo Cangiano
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Do hummingbirds see in ultraviolet?

Authors:  M Curé; A G Palacios
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2009-04-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.