Literature DB >> 9604942

Electrocardiographic and clinical predictors of acute myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina pectoris.

D M Lloyd-Jones1, C A Camargo, P Lapuerta, R P Giugliano, C J O'Donnell.   

Abstract

Among patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP), those who have non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at higher risk for subsequent adverse events. To determine predictors of AMI in patients with UAP, we studied consecutive nonreferral patients with UAP or AMI admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care or telemetry units of an urban teaching hospital over 1 year. There were 280 study patients (mean age 66 years, 1/3 women); 24% had AMI at presentation, whereas 76% had UAP without evidence of AMI. Thresholds of > or = 3 involved leads (odds ratio [OR] 3.3; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.6 to 6.9) and > or = 0.2 mV (OR 5.1; 95% CI 2.2 to 11.6) of ST depression on the presenting electrocardiogram were strongly associated with AMI. The multivariate predictors of AMI were reported duration of symptoms >4 hours (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.9 to 7.3), absence of prior revascularization (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.6 to 7.5), absence of beta-blocker use before presentation (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 5.8), and presence of new ST depression (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 5.7). Using the 4 multivariate predictors, a prediction rule was developed. The percentages of patients with AMI when 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 characteristics were present, respectively, were 7%, 6%, 24%, 46%, and 83% (p <0.001). A similar prediction rule developed from the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Ischemia III trial was validated in our cohort. Among patients with UAP, electrocardiographic and clinical variables can help immediately identify those at high risk for AMI at presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9604942     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00155-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Regular review: treatment possibilities for unstable angina.

Authors:  A Manhapra; S Borzak
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-18

2.  Initial presenting electrocardiogram as determinant for hospital admission in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a pilot investigation.

Authors:  Prasanna K Challa; Karen M Smith; C Richard Conti
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Risk Stratification in Patients with Unstable Angina and Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Akshay S. Desai; Peter H. Stone
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-02

Review 4.  Cardiac CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  Nam Ju Lee; Harold Litt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Assessment of acute myocardial infarction: current status and recommendations from the North American society for Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; David Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Fabio P Esteves; Ernest V Garcia; Matthias Gutberlet; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Raymond K Kwong; Eike Nagel; Stamatios Lerakis; John Oshinski; Jean-François Paul; Richard Underwood; Bernd J Wintersperger; Michael R Rees
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.