Literature DB >> 9604580

patients' satisfaction with different types of veneer restorations.

A C Meijering1, F J Roeters, J Mulder, N H Creugers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to measure the satisfaction of patients with respect to the aesthetics of veneer restorations (VRs) and to identify potential factors influencing their satisfaction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty VRs of three different types (direct composite, indirect composite and porcelain) were placed on anterior teeth. Patients were asked to fill in questionnaires at baseline and at one- and two-year recalls.
RESULTS: At baseline the overall satisfaction was 76%, after two years this was 78%. The variable 'type of VR' was the only factor measured that had a significant influence on the satisfaction of the patient. At the two-year evaluation patients with porcelain VRs were more satisfied than those with direct composite VRs (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: From the results of this study it is concluded that differences in clinical procedures had no effect on satisfaction. Also the number of VRs had not influenced the level of satisfaction. After two years a significant difference was observed for the variable 'type of VR', with the best results for porcelain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9604580     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00067-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  2 in total

1.  Esthetic Rehabilitation of the Smile with No-Prep Porcelain Laminates and Partial Veneers.

Authors:  Arcelino Farias-Neto; Edna Maria da Cunha Ferreira Gomes; Alfonso Sánchez-Ayala; Alejandro Sánchez-Ayala; Larissa Soares Reis Vilanova
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2015-10-18

Review 2.  The Success of Dental Veneers According To Preparation Design and Material Type.

Authors:  Yousef Alothman; Maryam Saleh Bamasoud
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.