Literature DB >> 9604408

An evaluation of practice nurses working with general practitioners to treat people with depression.

A H Mann1, R Blizard, J Murray, J A Smith, N Botega, E MacDonald, G Wilkinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and treatment of depression constitutes a significant component of a general practitioner's workload. A pilot study has suggested that the practice nurse may have an important contribution to make in the care of patients with depression. AIM: To evaluate an extended role for practice nurses in improving the outcome of depression through two specially-designed interviews running in parallel.
METHOD: Two naturalistic, random allocation studies took place concurrently over four months. Study 1 evaluated the effectiveness of standardized psychiatric assessment by a practice nurse and feedback of information to the general practitioner (GP). Study 2 evaluated the above assessment and feedback combined with nurse-assisted follow-up care. Twenty general practices participating in the Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework took part in the study. Subjects included general practice attenders identified as depressed by their GP. The main outcome measures were a change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores and in the proportion of patients fulfilling DSM-III criteria for major depression.
RESULTS: A total of 577 patients were recruited; 516 [89% (95% CI = 86-92%)] were rated as depressed on the BDI and 474 [82% (95% CI = 79-85%)] met criteria for DSM-III major depression. Altogether, 524 (91%) patients completed follow-up at four months. All groups of patients showed improvement, but no difference in the rate of improvement was shown for the nurse intervention groups. BDI mean scores fell from 18.54 (95% CI = 17.53-20.06) to 11.53 (95% CI = 10.02-13.04) in Study 1, and from 21.01 (95% = CI 20.26-21.86) to 10.62 (95% CI = 9.73-11.51) in Study 2. The proportion of patients fulfilling criteria for DSM-III major depression in Study 1 fell from 80% (95% CI = 73-87%) to 30% (95% CI = 22-38%), and in Study 2 from 80% (95% CI = 76-84%) to 27% (95% CI = 23-31%). Prescription rates of antidepressant medication were higher than expected, ranging between 63% and 76% in the two studies.
CONCLUSION: There was an increase in the rate of antidepressant prescription, but no additional benefit could be adduced for patients who received a nurse intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9604408      PMCID: PMC1409896     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  5 in total

1.  A survey of links between mental health professionals and general practice in six district health authorities.

Authors:  R V Thomas; R H Corney
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

3.  A. I. F. Scott & C. P. L. Freeman's "Edinburgh Primary Care Depression Study.

Authors:  J Scott; C A Moon; C V Blacker; J M Thomas
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. Impact on depression in primary care.

Authors:  W Katon; M Von Korff; E Lin; E Walker; G E Simon; T Bush; P Robinson; J Russo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The role of the practice nurse in the management of depression in general practice: treatment adherence to antidepressant medication.

Authors:  G Wilkinson; P Allen; E Marshall; J Walker; W Browne; A H Mann
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.723

  5 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Improving the detection and management of depression in primary care.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; P M Whitty; J M Grimshaw; R E Thomas
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

2.  Evaluating a mental health assessment for older people with depressive symptoms in general practice: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Antony J Arthur; Carol Jagger; James Lindesay; Ruth J Matthews
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Primary care mental health workers: models of working and evidence of effectiveness.

Authors:  Peter Bower
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care.

Authors:  Peter Bower; Sarah Knowles; Peter A Coventry; Nancy Rowland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

5.  From staff-mix to skill-mix and beyond: towards a systemic approach to health workforce management.

Authors:  Carl-Ardy Dubois; Debbie Singh
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2009-12-19

6.  Improving access to depression care: descriptive report of a multidisciplinary primary care pilot service.

Authors:  Lorrie Symons; André Tylee; Anthony Mann; Roger Jones; Susan Plummer; Maria Walker; Carole Duff; Rebecca Holt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Quality of care provided by mid-level health workers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Giorgio Cometto; Luis Huicho; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Collaborative chronic care models for mental health conditions: cumulative meta-analysis and metaregression to guide future research and implementation.

Authors:  Christopher J Miller; Andrew Grogan-Kaylor; Brian E Perron; Amy M Kilbourne; Emily Woltmann; Mark S Bauer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Reporting of Sex Effects by Systematic Reviews on Interventions for Depression, Diabetes, and Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Wei Duan-Porter; Karen M Goldstein; Jennifer R McDuffie; Jaime M Hughes; Megan E B Clowse; Ruth S Klap; Varsha Masilamani; Nancy M Allen LaPointe; Avishek Nagi; Jennifer M Gierisch; John W Williams
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  On-site mental health workers delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients in primary care: effects on the professional practice of primary care providers.

Authors:  Elaine F Harkness; Peter J Bower
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.