Literature DB >> 9602779

Effects of lesion between bone, periosteum and muscle on fracture healing in rats.

S E Utvåg1, O Grundnes, O Reikerås.   

Abstract

We assessed the effects of periosteal detachment from bone and musculature on the healing of diaphyseal fracture. In 30 male Wistar rats we produced a partial osteotomy, which was manually broken in the middiaphysis of the left femur. All fractures were reamed and stabilized with an 1.6 mm steel pin. The animals were randomly assigned to 3 groups. In group 1, a subperiosteal detachment between cortex and periost was created in the middle third of the diaphysis. An extraperiosteal detachment between periost and the surrounding musculature was performed in group 2. In group 3, the periosteum was isolated from the musculature by an extraperiosteal detachment and application of an e-PTFE sheath (Gore-Tex expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) around the shaft between the periost and the surrounding muscles. The rats were killed after 4 weeks and callus formation and mechanical characteristics were measured. All fractures healed by production of external callus. The callus area was significantly less in the group where periost was mechanically isolated from the surrounding muscles compared to the other groups. Bending moment, bending rigidity and fracture energy were less in this group than in groups 1 and 2. No differences were detected between the sub- and extraperiosteal groups, either in callus formation or in mechanical measurements. Our findings underline the importance of the muscle-periosteal connection for periosteal healing of diaphyseal fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9602779     DOI: 10.3109/17453679809117623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  9 in total

Review 1.  Plastic Surgery Challenges in War Wounded I: Flap-Based Extremity Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jennifer M Sabino; Julia Slater; Ian L Valerio
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Influence of haemorrhagic shock on fracture healing.

Authors:  Mark Bumann; Thomas Henke; Heinz Gerngross; Lutz Claes; Peter Augat
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Role of IGF-I signaling in muscle bone interactions.

Authors:  Daniel D Bikle; Candice Tahimic; Wenhan Chang; Yongmei Wang; Anastassios Philippou; Elisabeth R Barton
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Temporal profile of microvascular disturbances in rat tibial periosteum following closed soft tissue trauma.

Authors:  K D Schaser; L Zhang; N P Haas; T Mittlmeier; G Duda; H J Bail
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Myoconductive and osteoinductive free-standing polysaccharide membranes.

Authors:  Sofia G Caridade; Claire Monge; Jorge Almodóvar; Raphael Guillot; Jonathan Lavaud; Véronique Josserand; Jean-Luc Coll; João F Mano; Catherine Picart
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 6.  Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing.

Authors:  K M Davis; K S Griffin; Tm G Chu; J C Wenke; B T Corona; T O McKinley; M A Kacena
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 7.  Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease.

Authors:  Jacqui Anne McGovern; Michelle Griffin; Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.758

8.  Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration.

Authors:  Céline Colnot
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Soft-tissue reconstruction of open fractures of the lower limb: muscle versus fasciocutaneous flaps.

Authors:  James K-K Chan; Lorraine Harry; Garry Williams; Jagdeep Nanchahal
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.