AIMS: To devise a method to describe and quantify the shape of polar profiles obtained with the scanning laser polarimeter and to compare this measurement with other polar profile measurements in a series of normal subjects and glaucoma patients. METHODS: Scanning laser polarimetry was performed on 54 normal subjects and 74 glaucoma patients. The retardation values obtained from one randomly chosen eye of each subject were analysed using our own methods, including the use of an algorithm to remove blood vessels from the polar profiles, an algorithm to standardise the glaucoma profiles to a normal database, and a further algorithm to evaluate the profile shape. The measurements of profile shape were compared with measurements of the absolute and standardised retinal nerve fibre layer thickness obtained with the scanning laser polarimeter. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the mean retardation values for the normal and glaucomatous subjects in either hemiretina. However, standardisation of the glaucoma retardation values to a normal database produced significant differences at p < 1 x 10-8 in the mean retardation values for these two groups in both hemiretinas. Profile shape measurement analysis produced similar significant differences between the mean retardation values for the normal and glaucomatous subjects in both hemiretinas, although the degree of separation was greater following standardisation of the retardation values. CONCLUSION: The use of an algorithm to standardise an individual's retardation values in conjunction with a blood vessel removal algorithm enables an improvement in the ability of the scanning laser polarimeter to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous patients. The polar profile shape algorithm is independent of standardisation and significantly improves the discrimination between normal and glaucomatous patients, as well as providing additional information regarding the retinal nerve fibre layer.
AIMS: To devise a method to describe and quantify the shape of polar profiles obtained with the scanning laser polarimeter and to compare this measurement with other polar profile measurements in a series of normal subjects and glaucomapatients. METHODS: Scanning laser polarimetry was performed on 54 normal subjects and 74 glaucomapatients. The retardation values obtained from one randomly chosen eye of each subject were analysed using our own methods, including the use of an algorithm to remove blood vessels from the polar profiles, an algorithm to standardise the glaucoma profiles to a normal database, and a further algorithm to evaluate the profile shape. The measurements of profile shape were compared with measurements of the absolute and standardised retinal nerve fibre layer thickness obtained with the scanning laser polarimeter. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the mean retardation values for the normal and glaucomatous subjects in either hemiretina. However, standardisation of the glaucoma retardation values to a normal database produced significant differences at p < 1 x 10-8 in the mean retardation values for these two groups in both hemiretinas. Profile shape measurement analysis produced similar significant differences between the mean retardation values for the normal and glaucomatous subjects in both hemiretinas, although the degree of separation was greater following standardisation of the retardation values. CONCLUSION: The use of an algorithm to standardise an individual's retardation values in conjunction with a blood vessel removal algorithm enables an improvement in the ability of the scanning laser polarimeter to discriminate between normal and glaucomatouspatients. The polar profile shape algorithm is independent of standardisation and significantly improves the discrimination between normal and glaucomatouspatients, as well as providing additional information regarding the retinal nerve fibre layer.
Authors: R N Weinreb; S Shakiba; P A Sample; S Shahrokni; S van Horn; V S Garden; S Asawaphureekorn; L Zangwill Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 5.258