Literature DB >> 9601018

The host defence function of genomic methylation patterns.

T H Bestor1.   

Abstract

It has long been held that reversible promoter methylation allows genes to be expressed in the appropriate cell types during development. However, no endogenous gene has been proven to be regulated in this way, and it does not appear that significant numbers of promoters are methylated in non-expressing tissues. It has recently become clear that the large majority of genomic 5-methylcytosine is actually in parasitic sequence elements (transposons and endogenous retroviruses), and the primary function of DNA methylation now appears to be defence against the large burden of parasitic sequence elements, which constitute more than 35% of the human genome. Direct transcriptional repression provides short-term control, and the tendency of 5-methylcytosine to deaminate to thymidine drives irreversible inactivation. It is suggested that intragenomic parasites are recognized by virtue of their high copy number, and that the disturbances of methylation patterns commonly seen in human cancer cells activate a host of parasitic sequence elements, which destabilize the genome and tip the cell towards the transformed state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9601018     DOI: 10.1002/9780470515501.ch11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Novartis Found Symp        ISSN: 1528-2511


  30 in total

Review 1.  Introduction to immunostimulatory DNA sequences.

Authors:  J Van Uden; E Raz
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2000

2.  Methylation-mediated proviral silencing is associated with MeCP2 recruitment and localized histone H3 deacetylation.

Authors:  M C Lorincz; D Schübeler; M Groudine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Above and within the genome: epigenetics past and present.

Authors:  F D Urnov; A P Wolffe
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 4.  Transgene silencing in monocots.

Authors:  L M Iyer; S P Kumpatla; M B Chandrasekharan; T C Hall
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  A simple method for estimating global DNA methylation using bisulfite PCR of repetitive DNA elements.

Authors:  Allen S Yang; Marcos R H Estécio; Ketan Doshi; Yutaka Kondo; Eloiza H Tajara; Jean-Pierre J Issa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Associations of LINE-1 DNA Methylation with Preterm Birth in a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Heather H Burris; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Andrea Baccarelli; Letizia Tarantini; Caroline E Boeke; Ken Kleinman; Augusto A Litonjua; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 7.  Environmental epigenetics.

Authors:  V Bollati; A Baccarelli
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  The implications of DNA methylation for toxicology: toward toxicomethylomics, the toxicology of DNA methylation.

Authors:  Moshe Szyf
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  MBRidge: an accurate and cost-effective method for profiling DNA methylome at single-base resolution.

Authors:  Wanshi Cai; Fengbiao Mao; Huajing Teng; Tao Cai; Fangqing Zhao; Jinyu Wu; Zhong Sheng Sun
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.216

10.  DNA methylation prevents CTCF-mediated silencing of the oncogene BCL6 in B cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Anne Y Lai; Mehrnaz Fatemi; Archana Dhasarathy; Christine Malone; Steve E Sobol; Cissy Geigerman; David L Jaye; Deepak Mav; Ruchir Shah; Leping Li; Paul A Wade
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 14.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.