Literature DB >> 9599996

Effects of modality on subjective frequency estimates and processing of spoken and printed words.

D E Gaygen1, P A Luce.   

Abstract

Previous research (Garber & Pisoni, 1991; Pisoni & Garber, 1990) has demonstrated that subjective familiarity judgments for words are not differentially affected by the modality (visual or auditory) in which the words are presented, suggesting that participants base their judgments on fairly abstract, modality-independent representations in memory. However, in a recent large-scale study in Japanese (Amano, Kondo, & Kakehi, 1995), marked modality effects on familiarity ratings were observed. The present research further examined possible modality differences in subjective ratings and their implications for word recognition. Specially selected words were presented to participants for frequency judgments. In particular, participants were asked how frequently they read, wrote, heard, or said a given spoken or printed word. These ratings were then regressed against processing times in auditory and visual lexical decision and naming tasks. Our results suggest modality dependence for some lexical representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9599996     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  6 in total

1.  Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words.

Authors:  D A Balota; M Pilotti; M J Cortese
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-06

2.  Is subjective word familiarity a meter of ambient language? A natural experiment on effects of perceptual experience.

Authors:  E T Auer; L E Bernstein; P E Tucker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

3.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Estimating when and how words are acquired: a natural experiment on the development of the mental lexicon.

Authors:  Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Subjective frequency ratings for 432 ASL signs.

Authors:  Rachel I Mayberry; Matthew L Hall; Meghan Zvaigzne
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.