Literature DB >> 9597298

Use of the rectal examination on children with acute abdominal pain.

S J Scholer1, K Pituch, D P Orr, R S Dittus.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which general pediatricians perform a rectal examination on children with a complaint of acute abdominal pain and to determine factors associated with performing a rectal examination. Children were eligible for the study if they were 2 to 12 years of age and presented to the clinic or emergency department of a municipal teaching hospital with a complaint of abdominal pain of less than or equal to three days' duration. Measured variables included demographic characteristics and presenting signs and symptoms. For each patient, a clinical reviewer (1) assigned a final diagnosis, (2) determined whether a rectal examination had been performed, and (3) assessed the clinical contribution of the rectal examination findings. For 1,140 children presenting for a nonscheduled visit with acute abdominal pain, a rectal examination was performed on 4.9% (56/1,140). Using multiple logistic regression, children were more likely to have a rectal examination performed if they had abdominal tenderness (odds ratio [OR] = 3.3 and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 6.0), a history of constipation (OR = 6.0 and 95% CI, 2.3 to 15.3), or a history of rectal bleeding (OR = 9.1 and 95% CI, 2.9 to 29). Children were less likely to have had a rectal examination performed if they presented with associated symptoms of cough (OR = 0.32 and 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.74), headache (OR = 0.15 and 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.46), or sore throat (OR = 0.28 and 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.91). The final diagnoses of 12 children who had clinically contributory findings on rectal examination included: constipation (5), gastroenteritis (3), appendicitis (2), abdominal adhesions (1), and abdominal pain of unclear etiology (1). General pediatricians infrequently perform a rectal examination on children who present with a complaint of acute abdominal pain. Clinical factors affect the likelihood of whether a rectal examination is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9597298     DOI: 10.1177/000992289803700506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)        ISSN: 0009-9228            Impact factor:   1.168


  4 in total

1.  Medical myth: a digital rectal examination should be performed on all individuals with possible appendicitis.

Authors:  G S Brewster; M E Herbert
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-09

2.  Abdominal pain among children re-evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  Hong Zhou; Yi-Chen Chen; Jin-Zhe Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Occult Blood and Perianal Examination: Value Added in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Screening.

Authors:  Harland S Winter; Peter T Masiakos; Christopher J Moran; Jess L Kaplan
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 4.  Pediatric Rectal Exam: Why, When, and How.

Authors:  Susan R Orenstein; Arnold Wald
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.