Literature DB >> 9597051

Preferences of elderly men for prostate-specific antigen screening and the impact of informed consent.

A M Wolf1, J B Schorling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening test remains highly controversial, particularly in older men. This study was undertaken to assess the impact of information on the preferences of older men for such screening.
METHODS: The elderly cohort (age > or = 65 years) of a larger randomized trial was studied to determine the effect of a 3-minute scripted informational intervention on primary care patients' interest in PSA screening and on potential predictors of screening interest.
RESULTS: Informed patients were significantly less interested in screening than were uninformed patients (p = .006). Informed patients considered PSA screening to be significantly less efficacious than did uninformed patients (p = .004), but among both uninformed and informed patients, perceived efficacy correlated with interest in screening (multivariate OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.8 for uninformed patients; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.9 for informed patients). Perceived seriousness of prostate cancer predicted interest in screening among uninformed patients (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6), but not among informed patients. Informed patients who were married were less interested in screening than those who were single, divorced, or widowed (OR 0.3, 95% CI .08-0.9). Marital status did not predict screening interest among uninformed patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Involving elderly patients in the decision whether to screen with the PSA by providing them with information leads to a significant reduction in interest in such screening. Factors that appear to influence the screening preferences of informed elderly patients include perceived efficacy of screening and marital status, whereas uninformed patients are more likely to weigh the perceived seriousness of prostate cancer in their screening decision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9597051     DOI: 10.1093/gerona/53a.3.m195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci        ISSN: 1079-5006            Impact factor:   6.053


  7 in total

1.  Screening for prostate cancer in the UK. Seems to be creeping in by the back door.

Authors:  J L Donovan; S J Frankel; D E Neal; F C Hamdy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

2.  PSA--"prostate-specific antigen" or "patient stress & anxiety": a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Junaid Masood; Azhar Khan; Taufiq Sheikh; Noor Buchholz; Ron Miller; Andrew J Ball
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Challenging the Inevitability of Prostate Enlargement: Low Levels of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Among Tsimane Forager-Horticulturalists.

Authors:  Benjamin C Trumble; Jonathan Stieglitz; Daniel Eid Rodriguez; Edhitt Cortez Linares; Hillard S Kaplan; Michael D Gurven
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Age-related disparities in cancer screening: analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.

Authors:  Anthony F Jerant; Peter Franks; J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark P Doescher
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Patient-Provider Communication About Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment: New Evidence From the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Soumitra S Bhuyan; Aastha Chandak; Niodita Gupta; Sudhir Isharwal; Chad LaGrange; Asos Mahmood; Dan Gentry
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-07

Review 6.  Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Paul Sinfield; Richard Baker; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic; Andrew M Colman; Carolyn Tarrant; John K Mellon; William Steward; Roger Kockelbergh; Shona Agarwal
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Gurpreet K Rana; Sarah Hawley; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Karen Kelly-Blake; Donald E Nease; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 508.702

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.