Literature DB >> 9596496

Timing of initial screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity.

A K Hutchinson1, R A Saunders, J W O'Neil, A Lovering, M E Wilson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test a screening protocol for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) that uses the dual criteria of postconceptional age and chronological age, rather than a single parameter, to determine precisely when to begin eye examinations.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 179 infants (326 eyes) who had undergone laser treatment for threshold ROP. We entered their chronological and postconceptional ages at treatment into a database and evaluated various screening parameters to determine the combination of criteria that would allow us to safely postpone the initial eye examinations.
RESULTS: Screening infants at 7 weeks of chronological age or 34 weeks of postconceptional age (whichever comes first), but not before 5 weeks of chronological age, seems to reliably detect the onset of threshold ROP while reducing the number of unnecessary early examinations.
CONCLUSION: Simultaneously applied dual criteria of chronological age and postconceptional age may be a superior method of determining when to initiate ROP examinations and is preferable to using either chronological age or postconceptional age alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9596496     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.116.5.608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  9 in total

1.  The optimum time to employ telephotoscreening to detect retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  K G Yen; D Hess; B Burke; R A Johnson; W J Feuer; J T Flynn
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2000

2.  Non-ophthalmologist screening for retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  R A Saunders; M L Donahue; J E Berland; E L Roberts; B Von Powers; P F Rust
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Retinopathy of prematurity: Recommendations for screening.

Authors:  Al Jefferies
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Adopting Western Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Programs in Eastern Countries, are we Screening Properly?

Authors:  Almutez Gharaibeh; Mohammed Khassawneh; Wadah Khriesat; Shadi Alkhatib; Yazan Migdadi
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07

5.  Evaluation of modified retinopathy of prematurity screening guidelines using birth weight as the sole inclusion criterion.

Authors:  Kakarla V Chalam; Selina Lin; Ravi K Murthy; Vikram S Brar; Shailesh K Gupta; Ravi Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07

6.  Time at treatment of severe retinopathy of prematurity in China: recommendations for guidelines in more mature infants.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Jing Feng; Clare Gilbert; Hong Yin; Jianhong Liang; Xiaoxin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Incidence, timing and risk factors of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity in a North American cohort.

Authors:  Yinxi Yu; Lauren A Tomlinson; Gil Binenbaum; Gui-Shuang Ying
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Retinopathy of prematurity in Asian Indian babies weighing greater than 1250 grams at birth: ten year data from a tertiary care center in a developing country.

Authors:  Anand Vinekar; Mangat R Dogra; Tiakumzuk Sangtam; Anil Narang; Amod Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 9.  Practical guidelines for screening and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Saleh A Al Amro; Fahad Al Aql; Saad Al Hajar; Hassan Al Dhibi; Abdulrahman Al Nemri; Ahmed Mousa; Jawwad Ahmad
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.