W J Hueston1. 1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison Medical School, USA. huestowj@musc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the past decade, dramatic changes have occurred in the way family physicians deliver health care. OBJECTIVE: To examine how satisfied family physicians are with their practice and compensation and what factors are associated with higher or lower satisfaction. METHODS: As part of a larger study examining decision making for specific medical problems, a random sample of board-certified family physicians were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale their satisfaction with practice, satisfaction with compensation, and likelihood that they would again select their current specialty. Responses were collapsed into those satisfied or highly satisfied vs those who were neutral or dissatisfied. The likelihood of again selecting family practice as a specialty was dichotomized similarly into those very likely or likely vs all others. Bivariate and multiple regression comparisons were made with demographic and practice characteristic variables. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 58.1% (N = 537). Most family physicians (82.4%) are satisfied with their careers, most (65.5%) are satisfied with the compensation they receive, and, if given the opportunity, most (74.9%) would again select family practice as their specialty. Factors that appeared to be associated with lower levels on more than 1 satisfaction measure included working in a group of physicians with 3 or fewer members and not including maternity care in one's practice. In addition, older physicians stated they were less likely to enter family practice again, and those who worked more hours were less satisfied with their compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, family physicians are satisfied with their careers and compensation. The observation that those in smaller group practices were less satisfied suggests that practices with smaller numbers of members will continue to decline while the number of family physicians employed in larger group practices grows. This may have implications for health care delivery, especially in rural areas where smaller practices are more common.
BACKGROUND: During the past decade, dramatic changes have occurred in the way family physicians deliver health care. OBJECTIVE: To examine how satisfied family physicians are with their practice and compensation and what factors are associated with higher or lower satisfaction. METHODS: As part of a larger study examining decision making for specific medical problems, a random sample of board-certified family physicians were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale their satisfaction with practice, satisfaction with compensation, and likelihood that they would again select their current specialty. Responses were collapsed into those satisfied or highly satisfied vs those who were neutral or dissatisfied. The likelihood of again selecting family practice as a specialty was dichotomized similarly into those very likely or likely vs all others. Bivariate and multiple regression comparisons were made with demographic and practice characteristic variables. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 58.1% (N = 537). Most family physicians (82.4%) are satisfied with their careers, most (65.5%) are satisfied with the compensation they receive, and, if given the opportunity, most (74.9%) would again select family practice as their specialty. Factors that appeared to be associated with lower levels on more than 1 satisfaction measure included working in a group of physicians with 3 or fewer members and not including maternity care in one's practice. In addition, older physicians stated they were less likely to enter family practice again, and those who worked more hours were less satisfied with their compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, family physicians are satisfied with their careers and compensation. The observation that those in smaller group practices were less satisfied suggests that practices with smaller numbers of members will continue to decline while the number of family physicians employed in larger group practices grows. This may have implications for health care delivery, especially in rural areas where smaller practices are more common.
Authors: Michael C Klein; Ann Kelly; Andrea Spence; Janusz Kaczorowski; Stefan Grzybowski Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: M D Pérez-Cárceles; J E Pereñíguez-Barranco; E Osuna-Carrillo de Albornoz; A Luna-Maldonado Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2006-02-15 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Terry Zwiep; San Hilalion Ahn; Jamie Brehaut; Fady Balaa; Daniel I McIsaac; Susan Rich; Tom Wallace; Husein Moloo Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Khalid Bin Abdulrahman; Moath Yosef Alnosian; Abdulwahab Ali Alshamrani; Hatim Ibrahim ALassaf; Abdulrahman Saleh Aldayel; Yazeed Ahmed Alaskar; Mohammed Abdullah Alshehri Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2021-08-27
Authors: Khalid Bawakid; Ola Abdul Rashid; Najlaa Mandoura; Hassan Bin Usman Shah; Kholood Mugharbel Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2018 Sep-Oct