Literature DB >> 9596455

Practitioner self-confidence and patient outcomes in acute low back pain.

D R Smucker1, T R Konrad, P Curtis, T S Carey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes for patients with acute low back pain who received care from practitioners with different self-confidence scores on a 4-item scale.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of practitioners. Prospective cohort study of patient outcomes.
SETTING: Private practices and a group model health maintenance organization. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-nine practitioners, including private practice traditionally trained medical physicians, chiropractors, and physicians in a group model health maintenance organization, who were randomly chosen from practices across the state of North Carolina. These practitioners enrolled 1633 patients with acute low back pain into a prospective cohort study.
METHODS: The practitioner survey contained 10 questionnaire items that measured aspects of practitioner confidence and attitudes in assessing and treating patients with low back pain. Patients were interviewed by telephone after the initial office visit and at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks, or until complete recovery, whichever came first.
RESULTS: Of 189 study practitioners, 95% responded to the survey. A 4-item scale, shown by factor analysis to describe practitioners' self-confidence, demonstrated good internal consistency among physicians and chiropractors. Chiropractors had significantly stronger self-confidence scores than physicians. Among patients of primary care physicians and chiropractors, those who received care from practitioners with stronger self-confidence scores did not differ in the time to functional improvement, overall patient satisfaction, or their perception of the completeness of care.
CONCLUSION: The level of practitioner self-confidence, as measured by a 4-item scale, did not predict patient outcomes in the treatment of acute low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9596455     DOI: 10.1001/archfami.7.3.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Fam Med        ISSN: 1063-3987


  15 in total

1.  IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Ricky Mullis; Julie Young; Carol Doyle; Martyn Lewis; David Whitehurst; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Patterns and determinants of multiple provider use in patients with acute low back pain.

Authors:  V Sundararajan; T R Konrad; J Garrett; T Carey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Swiss chiropractic practice-based research network and musculoskeletal pain cohort pilot study: protocol of a nationwide resource to advance musculoskeletal health services research.

Authors:  Rahim Lalji; Léonie Hofstetter; Alice Kongsted; Viktor von Wyl; Milo A Puhan; Cesar A Hincapié
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Testing the effectiveness of an innovative information package on practitioner reported behaviour and beliefs: the UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low back pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) trial [ISRCTN77245761].

Authors:  David W Evans; Nadine E Foster; Martin Underwood; Steven Vogel; Alan C Breen; Tamar Pincus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Individualised cognitive functional therapy compared with a combined exercise and pain education class for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mary O'Keeffe; Helen Purtill; Norelee Kennedy; Peter O'Sullivan; Wim Dankaerts; Aidan Tighe; Lars Allworthy; Louise Dolan; Norma Bargary; Kieran O'Sullivan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  A systematic review comparing the costs of chiropractic care to other interventions for spine pain in the United States.

Authors:  Simon Dagenais; O'Dane Brady; Scott Haldeman; Pran Manga
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  A nurse-led clinic for patients consulting with osteoarthritis in general practice: development and impact of training in a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Emma L Healey; Chris J Main; Sarah Ryan; Gretl A McHugh; Mark Porcheret; Andrew G Finney; Andrew Morden; Krysia S Dziedzic
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ben Darlow; James Stanley; Sarah Dean; J Haxby Abbott; Sue Garrett; Fiona Mathieson; Anthony Dowell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Contemporary chiropractic practice in the UK: a field study of a chiropractor and his patients in a suburban chiropractic clinic.

Authors:  Bjorn J Hennius
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2013-08-08

10.  Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124).

Authors:  Annette Bishop; Reuben Ogollah; Bernadette Bartlam; Panos Barlas; Melanie A Holden; Khaled M Ismail; Sue Jowett; Martyn Lewis; Alison Lloyd; Christine Kettle; Jesse Kigozi; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.