Literature DB >> 9595904

The prevalence of risk factors among women in the United States by race and age, 1992-1994: opportunities for primary and secondary prevention.

R A Hahn1, S M Teutsch, A L Franks, M H Chang, E E Lloyd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence of 11 modifiable behavioral risk factors, including multiple risk factors, among white, black, Asian and Pacific Islander, American Indian, and Hispanic women in the United States.
DESIGN: We used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data for 1992 to 1994 to examine risk factors (smoking; obesity; diabetes; heavy alcohol consumption; sedentary lifestyle; and inadequate use of seat belts, pap smears, consumption of fruits or vegetables, mammography and colorectal screening, and immunization), among women age 18 to 49, 50 to 64, and 65 and older. We also conducted a multiple regression analysis, comparing the odds of having either 1-2 versus 0 or 3 or more versus 0 risk factors among racial/ethnic groups, controlling for education and family income, to see if racial/ethnic differences can be attributed to socioeconomic differences.
RESULTS: US women engage in a variety of behaviors that place them at risk for many causes of morbidity and mortality. Risk profiles vary substantially among racial/ethnic populations: Pacific Islanders have relatively low prevalences of most major risk factors, while blacks and American Indians have relatively high prevalences of many major risk factors. Prevalence differences among racial/ethnic populations are diminished but not eliminated when socioeconomic factors are accounted for.
CONCLUSIONS: Appropriately designed programs to help women reduce their behavioral risk factors are needed. Action by health care providers, communities, and policy makers can substantially improve the health of women in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9595904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)        ISSN: 0098-8421


  9 in total

1.  Seat belt use among Hispanic ethnic subgroups of national origin.

Authors:  N C Briggs; D G Schlundt; R S Levine; I A Goldzweig; N Stinson; R C Warren
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Developing a university-workforce partnership to address rural and frontier MCH training needs: the Rocky Mountain Public Health Education Consortium (RMPHEC).

Authors:  Douglas L Taren; Frances Varela; Jo Ann W Dotson; Joan Eden; Marlene Egger; John Harper; Rhonda Johnson; Kathy Kennedy; Helene Kent; Myra Muramoto; Jane C Peacock; Richard Roberts; Sheila Sjolander; Nan Streeter; Lily Velarde; Anne Hill
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-10-25

3.  The intersection of race, gender, and primary care: results from the Women Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  G Corbie-Smith; E Frank; H Nickens
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Does patient educational level affect office visits to family physicians?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Meredith A Goodwin; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Socioeconomic status, negative affect, and modifiable cancer risk factors in African-American smokers.

Authors:  Darla E Kendzor; Ludmila M Cofta-Woerpel; Carlos A Mazas; Yisheng Li; Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Lorraine R Reitzel; Tracy J Costello; Michael S Businelle; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Paul M Cinciripini; David W Wetter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Do HMOs affect educational disparities in health care?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks; Mark P Doescher; Barry G Saver
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: what are the linkages to chronic disease risk?

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Robert J Uhler; H Irene Hall; Peter A Briss
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Disparities in receipt of recommended care among younger versus older medicare beneficiaries: a cohort study.

Authors:  Ling Na; Joel E Streim; Liliana E Pezzin; Jibby E Kurichi; Dawei Xie; Hillary R Bogner; Pui L Kwong; Steven M Asch; Sean Hennessy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Healthcare provider perspectives on inequities in access to care for patients with inherited bleeding disorders.

Authors:  Sumedha Arya; Pamela Wilton; David Page; Laurence Boma-Fischer; Georgina Floros; Katie N Dainty; Rochelle Winikoff; Michelle Sholzberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.